Missing Dark Matter in the Local Universe
arXiv:1204.3377 · doi:10.1134/S1990341312020010
Abstract
A sample of 11 thousand galaxies with radial velocities V_ LG < 3500 km/s is used to study the features of the local distribution of luminous (stellar) and dark matter within a sphere of radius of around 50 Mpc around us. The average density of matter in this volume, Omega_m,loc=0.08+-0.02, turns out to be much lower than the global cosmic density Omega_m,glob=0.28+-0.03. We discuss three possible explanations of this paradox: 1) galaxy groups and clusters are surrounded by extended dark halos, the major part of the mass of which is located outside their virial radii; 2) the considered local volume of the Universe is not representative, being situated inside a giant void; and 3) the bulk of matter in the Universe is not related to clusters and groups, but is rather distributed between them in the form of massive dark clumps. Some arguments in favor of the latter assumption are presented. Besides the two well-known inconsistencies of modern cosmological models with the observational data: the problem of missing satellites of normal galaxies and the problem of missing baryons, there arises another one - the issue of missing dark matter.
19 pages, 7 figures, 1 table (accepted)
References in corpus (11)
- Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Three Year Results: Implications for Cosmology
- CIRS: Cluster Infall Regions in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey I. Infall Patterns and Mass Profiles
- Near-Infrared and Optical Luminosity Functions from the 6dF Galaxy Survey
- The Hubble flow around the Local Group
- Hubble flow around Fornax cluster of galaxies
- Galaxy-galaxy lensing constraints on the relation between baryons and dark matter in galaxies in the Red Sequence Cluster Survey 2
- Binary Galaxies in the Local Supercluster and Its Neighborhood
- Catalog of Nearby Isolated Galaxies in the Volume z<0.01
- Cosmological Density Fluctuations on 100Mpc Scales and their ISW Effect
- Fast motions of galaxies in the Coma I cloud: a case of Dark Attractor?
- Disturbed isolated galaxies: indicators of a dark galaxy population?
Cited by in corpus (26)
- Galaxies as simple dynamical systems: observational data disfavor dark matter and stochastic star formation
- Very high redshift quasars and the rapid emergence of super-massive black holes
- The KBC void and Hubble tension contradict CDM on a Gpc scale Milgromian dynamics as a possible solution
- A statistical investigation of the mass discrepancy-acceleration relation
- The failures of the standard model of cosmology require a new paradigm
- Cosmology and Convention
- Galaxy stability within a self-interacting dark matter halo
- The cosmic web of the Local Universe: cosmic variance, matter content and its relation to galaxy morphology
- Dynamics of astrophysical objects against the cosmological background
- Dark matter in galaxies
- Satellites in MW-like hosts: Environment dependence and close pairs
- Hubble flows and gravitational potentials in observable Universe
- Stellar and dark matter density in the Local Universe
- Intense look at Virgo Southern Extension
- Anatomy of Ursa Majoris
- Constraints on the star formation histories of galaxies in the Local Cosmological Volume
- Astrophysical Tests of Dark Matter Self-Interactions
- Enhanced prospects for direct detection of inelastic dark matter from a non-galactic diffuse component
- Large-scale structure and galaxy motions in the Leo/Cancer constellations
- The cosmological star formation history from the Local Cosmological Volume of galaxies and constraints on the matter homogeneity
- Dark energy domination in the local flow of giant galaxies
- Low Density Structures in the Local Universe. I. Diffuse Agglomerates of Galaxies
- Nearby groups of galaxies in the Hercules-Bootes constellations
- Dark and visible matter distribution in Coma cluster: theory vs observations
- Gas of thin tubes of massless scalar field as a possible model of unified dark fluid
- Can the Dark-Matter Deficit in the High-Redshift Galaxies Explain the Persistent Discrepancy in Hubble Constants?