Exploring the progenitors of brightest cluster galaxies at z~2

Abstract

We present a new method for tracing the evolution of BCGs from $z\sim 2$ to $z\sim 0$. We conclude on the basis of semi-analytical models that the best method to select BCG progenitors at $z\sim 2$ is a hybrid environmental density and stellar mass ranking approach. Ultimately we are able to retrieve 45\% of BCG progenitors. We apply this method on the CANDELS UDS data to construct a progenitor sample at high redshift. We furthermore populate the comparisons in local universe by using SDSS data with statistically likely contamination to ensure a fair comparison between high and low redshifts. Using these samples we demonstrate that the BCG sizes have grown by a factor of $\sim 3.2$ since $z\sim 2$, and BCG progenitors are mainly late-type galaxies, exhibiting less concentrated profiles than their early-type local counterparts. We find that BCG progenitors have more disturbed morphologies. In contrast, local BCGs have much smoother profiles. Moreover, we find that the stellar masses of BCGs have grown by a factor of $\sim 2.5$ since $z\sim 2$, and the SFR of BCG progenitors has a median value of 13.5 $M_{\odot }$yr${}^{-1}$, much higher than their quiescent local descendants. We demonstrate that over $z=1-2$ star formation and merging contribute equally to BCG mass growth. However, merging plays a dominant role in BCG assembly at $z\lesssim 1$. We also find that BCG progenitors at high-$z$ are not significantly different from other galaxies of similar mass at the same epoch. This suggests that the processes which differentiate BCGs from normal massive elliptical galaxies must occur at $z\lesssim 2$.

25 pages, 10 figures, accepted by MNRAS

References in corpus (16)

• The UKIRT Infrared Deep Sky Survey (UKIDSS)
• UV Star Formation Rates in the Local Universe
• The hierarchical formation of the brightest cluster galaxies
• 3D-HST+CANDELS: The Evolution of the Galaxy Size-Mass Distribution since $z=3$
• Size evolution of the most massive galaxies at 1.7<z<3 from GOODS NICMOS survey imaging
• How special are Brightest Group and Cluster Galaxies?
• The Subaru/XMM-Newton Deep Survey (SXDS) - II. Optical Imaging and Photometric Catalogs
• The Structures of Distant Galaxies I: Galaxy Structures and the Merger Rate to z~3 in the Hubble Ultra-Deep Field
• The Hierarchical Build-Up of Massive Galaxies and the Intracluster Light since z=1
• GALAPAGOS: From Pixels to Parameters
• The evolution of the brightest cluster galaxies since z~1 from the ESO Distant Cluster Survey (EDisCS)
• The Hawk-I UDS and GOODS Survey (HUGS): Survey design and deep K-band number counts
• Deconstructing the Galaxy Stellar Mass Function with UKIDSS and CANDELS: the Impact of Colour, Structure and Environment
• Minor vs Major Mergers: The Stellar Mass Growth of Massive Galaxies from z=3 using Number Density Selection Techniques
• FERENGI: Redshifting galaxies from SDSS to GEMS, STAGES and COSMOS
• Tracing galaxy populations through cosmic time: A critical test of methods for connecting the same galaxies between different redshifts at $z<3$

Cited by in corpus (6)

• The galaxy mass-size relation in CARLA clusters and proto-clusters at 1.4 < z < 2.8: larger cluster galaxy sizes
• The brightest UV-selected galaxies in protoclusters at $z\sim 4$: Ancestors of Brightest Cluster Galaxies?
• Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA) Survey: The Merging Potential of Brightest Group Galaxies
• Finding proto-clusters to trace galaxy evolution: I. The finder and its performance
• Multiple AGN activity during the BCG assembly of XDCPJ0044.0-2033 at z~1.6
• Strong Conformity and Assembly Bias: Towards a Physical Understanding of the Galaxy-Halo Connection in SDSS Clusters