Gravitational Lens Recovery with GLASS: Measuring the mass profile and shape of a lens
arXiv:1401.7990 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu1781
Abstract
We use a new non-parametric gravitational modelling tool -- \Glass{} -- to determine what quality of data (strong lensing, stellar kinematics, and/or stellar masses) are required to measure the circularly averaged mass profile of a lens and its shape. \Glass{} uses an under-constrained adaptive grid of mass pixels to model the lens, searching through thousands of models to marginalise over model uncertainties. Our key findings are as follows: (i) for pure lens data, multiple sources with wide redshift separation give the strongest constraints as this breaks the well-known mass-sheet or steepness degeneracy; (ii) a single quad with time delays also performs well, giving a good recovery of both the mass profile and its shape; (iii) stellar masses -- for lenses where the stars dominate the central potential -- can also break the steepness degeneracy, giving a recovery for doubles almost as good as having a quad with time delay data, or multiple source redshifts; (iv) stellar kinematics provide a robust measure of the mass at the half light radius of the stars that can also break the steepness degeneracy if the Einstein radius ; and (v) if , then stellar kinematic data can be used to probe the stellar velocity anisotropy -- an interesting quantity in its own right. Where information on the mass distribution from lensing and/or other probes becomes redundant, this opens up the possibility of using strong lensing to constrain cosmological models.
18 pages, 11 figures, accepted to MNRAS
References in corpus (16)
- The Sloan Lens ACS Survey. V. The Full ACS Strong-Lens Sample
- Cluster Lenses
- Mass and magnification maps for the Hubble Space Telescope Frontier Fields clusters: implications for high redshift studies
- Cosmological Constraints from Strong Gravitational Lensing in Galaxy Clusters
- The Highest Resolution Mass Map of Galaxy Cluster Substructure To Date Without Assuming Light Traces Mass: LensPerfect Analysis of Abell 1689
- Unveiling dark halos in lensing galaxies
- Large Einstein Radii: A Problem for LambdaCDM
- A New Estimate of the Hubble Time with Improved Modeling of Gravitational Lenses
- Gravitational lensing model degeneracies: Is steepness all-important?
- Non-parametric inversion of gravitational lensing systems with few images using a multi-objective genetic algorithm
- The Hubble constant inferred from 18 time-delay lenses
- Radial density profiles of time-delay lensing galaxies
- A generalisation of the mass-sheet degeneracy producing ring-like artefacts in the lens mass distribution
- Can one determine cosmological parameters from multi-plane strong lens systems?
- Two strong-lensing clusters confront universal dark-matter profiles
- The cluster lens ACO 1703: redshift contrast and the inner profile
Cited by in corpus (18)
- TDCOSMO IV: Hierarchical time-delay cosmography -- joint inference of the Hubble constant and galaxy density profiles
- Gravitational lens modeling with basis sets
- How to break the density-anisotropy degeneracy in spherical stellar systems
- The Hubble constant from eight time-delay galaxy lenses
- Strong Gravitational Lensing and the Stellar IMF of Early-type Galaxies
- Time Delay Lens Modelling Challenge
- Using wavelets to capture deviations from smoothness in galaxy-scale strong lenses
- Strong Lensing by Galaxies
- Light versus dark in strong-lens galaxies: Dark matter haloes that are rounder than their stars
- Sparse Lens Inversion Technique (SLIT): lens and source separability from linear inversion of the source reconstruction problem
- Gravitational lens modelling in a citizen science context
- Estimating the local dark matter density in a non-axisymmetric wobbling disc
- Models of gravitational lens candidates from Space Warps CFHTLS
- Pixelated Reconstruction of Foreground Density and Background Surface Brightness in Gravitational Lensing Systems using Recurrent Inference Machines
- Lessons from a blind study of simulated lenses: image reconstructions do not always reproduce true convergence
- Unveiling the Universe with Emerging Cosmological Probes
- A new strategy for matching observed and simulated lensing galaxies
- The lens SW05 J143454.4+522850: a fossil group at redshift 0.6?