A New Estimate of the Hubble Time with Improved Modeling of Gravitational Lenses
arXiv:0802.3219 · doi:10.1086/587635
Abstract
This paper examines free-form modeling of gravitational lenses using Bayesian ensembles of pixelated mass maps. The priors and algorithms from previous work are clarified and significant technical improvements are made. Lens reconstruction and Hubble Time recovery are tested using mock data from simple analytic models and recent galaxy-formation simulations. Finally, using published data, the Hubble Time is inferred through the simultaneous reconstruction of eleven time-delay lenses. The result is H_0^{-1}=13.7^{+1.8}_{-1.0} Gyr.
arXiv comment24 pages, 9 figures. Accepted to ApJ
References in corpus (21)
- Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Three Year Results: Implications for Cosmology
- Final Results from the Hubble Space Telescope Key Project to Measure the Hubble Constant
- The Hubble Constant: A Summary of the HST Program for the Luminosity Calibration of Type Ia Supernovae by Means of Cepheids
- Cepheid Calibrations from the Hubble Space Telescope of the Luminosity of Two Recent Type Ia Supernovae and a Re-determination of the Hubble Constant
- Gravitational Lens Time Delays: A Statistical Assessment of Lens Model Dependences and Implications for the Global Hubble Constant
- Non-parametric inversion of strong lensing systems
- Radial distribution and strong lensing statistics of satellite galaxies and substructure using high resolution LCDM hydrodynamical simulations
- A portable modeler of lensed quasars
- Non-parametric reconstruction of the galaxy-lens in PG1115+080
- Pixelated Lenses and H_0 from Time-delay QSOs
- Parameter degeneracy in models of the quadruple lens system Q2237+0305
- The Hubble time inferred from 10 time-delay lenses
- A multipole-Taylor expansion for the potential of gravitational lens MG J0414+0534
- Values of H_0 from Models of the Gravitational Lens 0957+561
- Gravitational lensing model degeneracies: Is steepness all-important?
- Non-parametric Reconstruction of Abell 2218 from Combined Weak and Strong Lensing
- COSMOGRAIL: the COSmological MOnitoring of GRAvItational Lenses V. The time delay in SDSS J1650+4251
- H0 from an orientation-unbiased sample of SZ and X-ray clusters
- Radial density profiles of time-delay lensing galaxies
- The necessity of dark matter in MOND within galactic scales
- The Quintuple Quasar: Mass Models and Interpretation
Cited by in corpus (46)
- Strong Lensing by Galaxies
- Dissecting the Gravitational Lens B1608+656. II. Precision Measurements of the Hubble Constant, Spatial Curvature, and the Dark Energy Equation of State
- Gravitationally lensed quasars and supernovae in future wide-field optical imaging surveys
- H0LiCOW - IX. Cosmographic analysis of the doubly imaged quasar SDSS 1206+4332 and a new measurement of the Hubble constant
- TDCOSMO IV: Hierarchical time-delay cosmography -- joint inference of the Hubble constant and galaxy density profiles
- Galaxy Masses
- Mass-sheet degeneracy, power-law models and external convergence: Impact on the determination of the Hubble constant from gravitational lensing
- Time Delay Cosmography
- The CFHTLS-Strong Lensing Legacy Survey (SL2S): Investigating the group-scale lenses with the SARCS sample
- Source-position transformation -- an approximate invariance in strong gravitational lensing
- The mass-sheet degeneracy and time-delay cosmography: Analysis of the strong lens RXJ1131-1231
- The Highest Resolution Mass Map of Galaxy Cluster Substructure To Date Without Assuming Light Traces Mass: LensPerfect Analysis of Abell 1689
- Strong lensing time-delay cosmography in the 2020s
- COSMOGRAIL: the COSmological MOnitoring of GRAvItational Lenses VII. Time delays and the Hubble constant from WFI J2033-4723
- SN Refsdal : Photometry and Time Delay Measurements of the First Einstein Cross Supernova
- Improved Constraints on the Gravitational Lens Q0957+561. II. Strong Lensing
- Three-dimensional Multi-probe Analysis of the Galaxy Cluster A1689
- Cosmological Constraints from Gravitational Lens Time Delays
- The Hubble constant from eight time-delay galaxy lenses
- The Hubble constant inferred from 18 time-delay lenses
- Lensing degeneracies and mass substructure
- Strong Gravitational Lensing and the Stellar IMF of Early-type Galaxies
- Light/Mass Offsets in the Lensing Cluster Abell 3827: Evidence for Collisional Dark Matter?
- Hubble constant and dark energy inferred from free-form determined time delay distances
- Constraining the low-mass end of the Initial Mass Function with Gravitational Lensing
- TDCOSMO 2025: Cosmological constraints from strong lensing time delays
- A Comparison of Cosmological Models Using Time Delay Lenses
- Resolving the baryon-fraction profile in lensing galaxies
- Gravitational Lens Recovery with GLASS: Measuring the mass profile and shape of a lens
- Gravitational lens candidates in the E-CDFS
- Cosmological Parameter Determination in Free-Form Strong Gravitational Lens Modeling
- Multi-color detection of gravitational arcs
- The cluster lens ACO 1703: redshift contrast and the inner profile
- Golden gravitational lensing systems from the Sloan Lens ACS Survey. I. SDSS J1538+5817: one lens for two sources
- Light versus dark in strong-lens galaxies: Dark matter haloes that are rounder than their stars
- Lensing time delays as a substructure constraint: a case study with the cluster SDSS~J1004+4112
- Lensed Image Angles: New Statistical Evidence for Substructure
- Results of optical monitoring of 5 SDSS double QSOs with the Nordic Optical Telescope
- Gravitational lens modelling in a citizen science context
- A Sampling Strategy for High-Dimensional Spaces Applied to Free-Form Gravitational Lensing
- Much ado about no offset -- Characterising the anomalous multiple-image configuration and the model-driven displacement between light and mass in the multi-plane strong lens Abell 3827
- Cosmic expansion from boson and fermion fields
- Strong Lensing and
- SDSS J1640+1932: a spectacular galaxy-quasar strong lens system
- A Lensing View On The Fundamental Plane
- Testing the uniqueness of gravitational lens mass models