Gravitational lens modelling in a citizen science context
arXiv:1502.00008 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stu2554
Abstract
We develop a method to enable collaborative modelling of gravitational lenses and lens candidates, that could be used by non-professional lens enthusiasts. It uses an existing free-form modelling program (glass), but enables the input to this code to be provided in a novel way, via a user-generated diagram that is essentially a sketch of an arrival-time surface. We report on an implementation of this method, SpaghettiLens, which has been tested in a modelling challenge using 29 simulated lenses drawn from a larger set created for the Space Warps citizen science strong lens search. We find that volunteers from this online community asserted the image parities and time ordering consistently in some lenses, but made errors in other lenses depending on the image morphology. While errors in image parity and time ordering lead to large errors in the mass distribution, the enclosed mass was found to be more robust: the model-derived Einstein radii found by the volunteers were consistent with those produced by one of the professional team, suggesting that given the appropriate tools, gravitational lens modelling is a data analysis activity that can be crowd-sourced to good effect. Ideas for improvement are discussed, these include (a) overcoming the tendency of the models to be shallower than the correct answer in test cases, leading to systematic overestimation of the Einstein radius by 10 per cent at present, and (b) detailed modelling of arcs.
arXiv comment10 pages, 12 figures
References in corpus (18)
- A Universal Density Profile from Hierarchical Clustering
- The Structure of Cold Dark Matter Halos
- Gravitationally lensed quasars and supernovae in future wide-field optical imaging surveys
- The Structure & Dynamics of Massive Early-type Galaxies: On Homology, Isothermality and Isotropy inside one Effective Radius
- A Bayesian analysis of regularised source inversions in gravitational lensing
- Semi-linear gravitational lens inversion
- Planet Hunters: A Transiting Circumbinary Planet in a Quadruple Star System
- The CFHTLS-Strong Lensing Legacy Survey (SL2S): Investigating the group-scale lenses with the SARCS sample
- RingFinder: automated detection of galaxy-scale gravitational lenses in ground-based multi-filter imaging data
- Non-parametric reconstruction of the galaxy-lens in PG1115+080
- Automated detection of galaxy-scale gravitational lenses in high resolution imaging data
- A New Estimate of the Hubble Time with Improved Modeling of Gravitational Lenses
- B1359+154: A Six Image Lens Produced by a z=1 Compact Group of Galaxies
- Hubble constant and dark energy inferred from free-form determined time delay distances
- Resolving the baryon-fraction profile in lensing galaxies
- The Quintuple Quasar: Mass Models and Interpretation
- Gravitational Lens Recovery with GLASS: Measuring the mass profile and shape of a lens
- A Sampling Strategy for High-Dimensional Spaces Applied to Free-Form Gravitational Lensing
Cited by in corpus (12)
- The population of galaxy-galaxy strong lenses in forthcoming optical imaging surveys
- Space Warps II. New Gravitational Lens Candidates from the CFHTLS Discovered through Citizen Science
- Ideas for Citizen Science in Astronomy
- The Hubble constant from eight time-delay galaxy lenses
- Automated galaxy-galaxy strong lens modelling: no lens left behind
- Hubble Asteroid Hunter: II. Identifying strong gravitational lenses in HST images with crowdsourcing
- Light versus dark in strong-lens galaxies: Dark matter haloes that are rounder than their stars
- SEAGLE--II: Constraints on feedback models in galaxy formation from massive early type strong lens galaxies
- The DES Bright Arcs Survey: Candidate Strongly Lensed Galaxy Systems from the Dark Energy Survey 5,000 Sq. Deg. Footprint
- Models of gravitational lens candidates from Space Warps CFHTLS
- Lessons from a blind study of simulated lenses: image reconstructions do not always reproduce true convergence
- The lens SW05 J143454.4+522850: a fossil group at redshift 0.6?