Two strong-lensing clusters confront universal dark-matter profiles
arXiv:astro-ph/0610011 · doi:10.1086/509782
Abstract
In the galaxy clusters SSDS J1004+411 and ACO 1689, a large number of multiply-imaged background objects have recently been observed. We use these data to map the projected mass distribution in the inner regions of these clusters. The source redshifts span a large range, which eliminates the degeneracies that plague nearly all lensing work. As a result the mass maps are very well-constrained, despite very weak prior assumptions. ACO 1689 lenses so many objects that we can afford to map it twice using disjoint sets of images, thus verifying our internal error estimates. We then deproject the mass maps (pretending for this purpose that they are spherical) and obtain inner profiles consistent with rho propto r^{-1} and indistinguishable from recent cold dark matter simulations. Assuming that baryons make only a small difference to the profile outside sim 10 kpc, these results support the prediction of a universal inner profile for dark matter structures, independent of any parametrization of that profile.
To appear in ApJL
References in corpus (18)
- The Inner Structure of LambdaCDM Halos III: Universality and Asymptotic Slopes
- Response of dark matter halos to condensation of baryons: cosmological simulations and improved adiabatic contraction model
- Strong Lensing Analysis of A1689 from Deep Advanced Camera Images
- The Dark Matter Distribution in the Central Regions of Galaxy Clusters
- The Dark Matter Distribution in the Central Regions of Galaxy Clusters: Implications for CDM
- Convergence and scatter of cluster density profiles
- Dynamical insight into dark-matter haloes
- On the origin of cold dark matter halo density profiles
- A portable modeler of lensed quasars
- Complex Structure of Galaxy Cluster Abell 1689: Evidence for a Merger from X-ray data?
- Semi-analytical dark matter halos and the Jeans equation
- Non-parametric mass reconstruction of A1689 from strong lensing data with SLAP
- Mass distribution in nearby Abell clusters
- Discovery of Multiply Imaged Galaxies behind the Cluster and Lensed Quasar SDSS J1004+4112
- Models of the giant quadruple quasar SDSS J1004+4112
- Scalelengths in Dark Matter Halos
- Intrinsic Degeneracy of Gravitational Lens Time Delays: the case for a simple quadruple system in CDM cosmology
- A universal density slope - velocity anisotropy relation
Cited by in corpus (27)
- Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
- Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite
- Cosmological Simulations with Self-Interacting Dark Matter I: Constant Density Cores and Substructure
- The Mass Distribution of SDSS J1004+4112 Revisited
- Combining Strong and Weak Gravitational Lensing in Abell 1689
- N-body simulations of gravitational dynamics
- The Highest Resolution Mass Map of Galaxy Cluster Substructure To Date Without Assuming Light Traces Mass: LensPerfect Analysis of Abell 1689
- Gravitational Shear, Flexion and Strong Lensing in Abell 1689
- LensPerfect: Gravitational Lens Massmap Reconstructions Yielding Exact Reproduction of All Multiple Images
- Mass-Galaxy offsets in Abell 3827, 2218 and 1689: intrinsic properties or line-of-sight substructures?
- Radial density profiles of time-delay lensing galaxies
- Accurate Realizations of the Ionized Gas in Galaxy Clusters: Calibrating Feedback
- Meso-structure in three strong-lensing systems
- Gravitational Lens Recovery with GLASS: Measuring the mass profile and shape of a lens
- A multi-wavelength strong lensing analysis of baryons and dark matter in the dynamically active cluster AC 114
- The cluster lens ACO 1703: redshift contrast and the inner profile
- A Systematic Review of Strong Gravitational Lens Modeling Software
- A Mass Model for the Lensing Cluster SDSS J1004+4112: Constraints From the Third Time Delay
- The mass distribution of a moderate redshift galaxy group and brightest group galaxy from gravitational lensing and kinematics
- Radial structure, inflow & central mass of stationary radiative galaxy clusters
- New Constraints on the Complex Mass Substructure in Abell 1689 from Gravitational Flexion
- Kinematic effect in gravitational lensing by clusters of galaxies
- Mapping the distribution of luminous and dark matter in strong lensing galaxies
- Parameter free Hubble constant from the quadruply lensed quasar SDSS J1004 + 4112
- Analysis of luminosity distributions and shape parameters of strong gravitational lensing elliptical galaxies
- Comparison of Strong Gravitational Lens Model Software I. Time delay and mass calculations are sensitive to changes in redshift and are model dependent
- Comparison of Strong Gravitational Lens Model Software III. Direct and indirect semi-independent lens model comparisons of COSMOS J095930+023427, SDSS J1320+1644, SDSSJ1430+4105 and J1000+0021