Likelihood Methods for Cluster Dark Energy Surveys
arXiv:astro-ph/0602147 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.73.067301
Abstract
Galaxy cluster counts at high redshift, binned into spatial pixels and binned into ranges in an observable proxy for mass, contain a wealth of information on both the dark energy equation of state and the mass selection function required to extract it. The likelihood of the number counts follows a Poisson distribution whose mean fluctuates with the large-scale structure of the universe. We develop a joint likelihood method that accounts for these distributions. Maximization of the likelihood over a theoretical model that includes both the cosmology and the observable-mass relations allows for a joint extraction of dark energy and cluster structural parameters.
4 pages
Cited by in corpus (36)
- Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration
- Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters
- Chandra Cluster Cosmology Project II: Samples and X-ray Data Reduction
- Galaxy Clusters Selected with the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect from 2008 South Pole Telescope Observations
- Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cluster Abundances and Weak Lensing
- The 400 square degrees ROSAT PSPC galaxy cluster survey: Catalog and statistical calibration
- Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Methods for Cluster Cosmology and Application to the SDSS
- Cosmological Constraints from the Red-Sequence Cluster Survey
- Primordial non-Gaussianity from the covariance of galaxy cluster counts
- Precision cosmology with a wide area XMM cluster survey
- Joint analysis of cluster number counts and weak lensing power spectrum to correct for the super-sample covariance
- Photometric Redshift Requirements for Self-Calibration of Cluster Dark Energy Studies
- The XMM Cluster Survey: Forecasting cosmological and cluster scaling-relation parameter constraints
- The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: The Voronoi-Delaunay Method catalog of galaxy groups
- Sensitivity of galaxy cluster dark energy constraints to halo modeling uncertainties
- Joint likelihood function of cluster counts and -point correlation functions: Improving their power through including halo sample variance
- Constraining the Mass-Richness Relationship of redMaPPer Clusters with Angular Clustering
- Estimating Luminosity Function Constraints from High-Redshift Galaxy Surveys
- The Effects of Halo Assembly Bias on Self-Calibration in Galaxy Cluster Surveys
- Cross-Calibration of Cluster Mass-Observables
- Super-sample covariance approximations and partial sky coverage
- A Method for Measuring the Bias of High-Redshift Galaxies from Cosmic Variance
- The most massive objects in the Universe
- Annealing a Follow-up Program: Improvement of the Dark Energy Figure of Merit for Optical Galaxy Cluster Surveys
- How covariant is the galaxy luminosity function?
- Exploring Cosmic Origins with CORE: Cluster Science
- Stacked Weak Lensing Mass Calibration: Estimators, Systematics, and Impact on Cosmological Parameter Constraints
- The probability distribution function of the SZ power spectrum: an analytical approach
- Influence of Projection in Cluster Cosmology Studies
- What do cluster counts really tell us about the Universe?
- A clustering-based self-calibration of the richness-to-mass relation of CAMIRA galaxy clusters out to in the Hyper Suprime-Cam survey
- Cosmology with Galaxy Clusters: Systematic Effects in the Halo Mass Function
- The impact of halo concentration on the Sunyaev Zel'dovich effect signal from massive galaxy clusters
- Cosmological constraints from Sunyaev-Zeldovich cluster counts: an approach to account for missing redshifts
- Built-in precision: Improving cluster cosmology through the self-calibration of a galaxy cluster sample
- Towards including super-sample covariance in the unbinned likelihood for cluster abundance cosmology