Annealing a Follow-up Program: Improvement of the Dark Energy Figure of Merit for Optical Galaxy Cluster Surveys
arXiv:0907.2690 · doi:10.1088/0004-637X/713/2/1207
Abstract
The precision of cosmological parameters derived from galaxy cluster surveys is limited by uncertainty in relating observable signals to cluster mass. We demonstrate that a small mass-calibration follow-up program can significantly reduce this uncertainty and improve parameter constraints, particularly when the follow-up targets are judiciously chosen. To this end, we apply a simulated annealing algorithm to maximize the dark energy information at fixed observational cost, and find that optimal follow-up strategies can reduce the observational cost required to achieve a specified precision by up to an order of magnitude. Considering clusters selected from optical imaging in the Dark Energy Survey, we find that approximately 200 low-redshift X-ray clusters or massive Sunyaev-Zel'dovich clusters can improve the dark energy figure of merit by 50%, provided that the follow-up mass measurements involve no systematic error. In practice, the actual improvement depends on (1) the uncertainty in the systematic error in follow-up mass measurements, which needs to be controlled at the 5% level to avoid severe degradation of the results; and (2) the scatter in the optical richness-mass distribution, which needs to be made as tight as possible to improve the efficacy of follow-up observations.
12 pages, 7 figures, replaced to match published version
References in corpus (21)
- Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation
- Testing X-ray Measurements of Galaxy Clusters with Cosmological Simulations
- Systematics in the X-ray Cluster Mass Estimators
- Galaxy clusters discovered with a Sunyaev-Zel'dovich effect survey
- Comparison of weak lensing masses and X-ray properties of galaxy clusters
- LoCuSS: Comparison of Observed X-ray and Lensing Galaxy Cluster Scaling Relations with Simulations
- Evidence for Non-Hydrostatic Gas from the Cluster X-ray to Lensing Mass Ratio
- Constraining the Scatter in the Mass-Richness Relation of maxBCG Clusters With Weak Lensing and X-ray Data
- Precision photometric redshift calibration for galaxy-galaxy weak lensing
- Cosmological Constraints from the Red-Sequence Cluster Survey
- Figure of Merit for Dark Energy Constraints from Current Observational Data
- Non-Equilibrium Electrons and the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect of Galaxy Clusters
- Photometric Redshift Requirements for Self-Calibration of Cluster Dark Energy Studies
- The Impact of Halo Properties, Energy Feedback and Projection Effects on the Mass-SZ Flux Relation
- Constraining Dark Energy with Clusters: Complementarity with Other Probes
- The Effects of Halo Assembly Bias on Self-Calibration in Galaxy Cluster Surveys
- The Sunyaev-Zeldovich Background
- Cross-Calibration of Cluster Mass-Observables
- Optimising Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Surveys - I: Testing the concordance LCDM cosmology
- Optimizing baryon acoustic oscillation surveys II: curvature, redshifts, and external datasets
- Issues in joint SZ and optical cluster finding
Cited by in corpus (26)
- Cosmological Parameters from Observations of Galaxy Clusters
- The Observed Growth of Massive Galaxy Clusters I: Statistical Methods and Cosmological Constraints
- SPT-3G: A Next-Generation Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Experiment on the South Pole Telescope
- On the Accuracy of Weak Lensing Cluster Mass Reconstructions
- Weighing the Giants IV: Cosmology and Neutrino Mass
- Weighing the Giants - I. Weak-lensing masses for 51 massive galaxy clusters: project overview, data analysis methods and cluster images
- Weighing the Giants - III. Methods and Measurements of Accurate Galaxy Cluster Weak-Lensing Masses
- The XMM Cluster Survey: Optical analysis methodology and the first data release
- Growth of Cosmic Structure: Probing Dark Energy Beyond Expansion
- The XMM Cluster Survey: X-ray analysis methodology
- Cosmology with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope: an Overview
- Confronting Dark Energy Models using Galaxy Cluster Number Counts
- The Blanco Cosmology Survey: An Optically-Selected Galaxy Cluster Catalog and a Public Release of Optical Data Products
- Precision cosmology with a wide area XMM cluster survey
- Virial scaling of galaxies in clusters: bright to faint is cool to hot
- Rhapsody-G simulations: galaxy clusters as baryonic closed boxes and the covariance between hot gas and galaxies
- Spectroscopic Quantification of Projection Effects in the SDSS redMaPPer Galaxy Cluster Catalogue
- Center-Excised X-ray Luminosity as an Efficient Mass Proxy for Future Galaxy Cluster Surveys
- Stacked Weak Lensing Mass Calibration: Estimators, Systematics, and Impact on Cosmological Parameter Constraints
- Impact of Systematics on SZ-Optical Scaling Relations
- Chandra Follow-Up of the SDSS DR8 redMaPPer Catalog Using the MATCha Pipeline
- Cosmology with the largest galaxy cluster surveys: Going beyond Fisher matrix forecasts
- X-ray Cluster Constraints on Non-Gaussianity
- Mass Bias of Weak Lensing Shear-selected Galaxy Cluster Samples
- The XMM Cluster Survey analysis of the SDSS DR8 redMaPPer Catalogue: Implications for scatter, selection bias, and isotropy in cluster scaling relations
- Dynamics and Constraints of the Massive Gravitons Dark Matter Flat Cosmologies