Optimizing baryon acoustic oscillation surveys II: curvature, redshifts, and external datasets
arXiv:0905.3410 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15818.x
Abstract
We extend our study of the optimization of large baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) surveys to return the best constraints on the dark energy, building on Paper I of this series (Parkinson et al. 2007). The survey galaxies are assumed to be pre-selected active, star-forming galaxies observed by their line emission with a constant number density across the redshift bin. Star-forming galaxies have a redshift desert in the region 1.6 < z < 2, and so this redshift range was excluded from the analysis. We use the Seo & Eisenstein (2007) fitting formula for the accuracies of the BAO measurements, using only the information for the oscillatory part of the power spectrum as distance and expansion rate rulers. We go beyond our earlier analysis by examining the effect of including curvature on the optimal survey configuration and updating the expected `prior' constraints from Planck and SDSS. We once again find that the optimal survey strategy involves minimizing the exposure time and maximizing the survey area (within the instrumental constraints), and that all time should be spent observing in the low-redshift range (z<1.6) rather than beyond the redshift desert, z>2. We find that when assuming a flat universe the optimal survey makes measurements in the redshift range 0.1 < z <0.7, but that including curvature as a nuisance parameter requires us to push the maximum redshift to 1.35, to remove the degeneracy between curvature and evolving dark energy. The inclusion of expected other data sets (such as WiggleZ, BOSS and a stage III SN-Ia survey) removes the necessity of measurements below redshift 0.9, and pushes the maximum redshift up to 1.5. We discuss considerations in determining the best survey strategy in light of uncertainty in the true underlying cosmological model.
15 pages, revised in response to referees remarks, accepted for publication in MNRAS. 2nd paper in a series. Paper 1 is at http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0702040
References in corpus (13)
- Measuring the Baryon Acoustic Oscillation scale using the SDSS and 2dFGRS
- Report of the Dark Energy Task Force
- Clustering Analyses of 300,000 Photometrically Classified Quasars--I. Luminosity and Redshift Evolution in Quasar Bias
- Dynamical Dark Energy or Simply Cosmic Curvature?
- The 2dF-SDSS LRG and QSO survey: evolution of the clustering of luminous red galaxies since z = 0.6
- Findings of the Joint Dark Energy Mission Figure of Merit Science Working Group
- BigBOSS: The Ground-Based Stage IV Dark Energy Experiment
- Planck priors for dark energy surveys
- Optimising large galaxy surveys for ISW detection
- Optimising Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Surveys - I: Testing the concordance LCDM cosmology
- Deconstructing Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: A Comparison of Methods
- Forecasting the Dark Energy Measurement with Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: Prospects for the LAMOST surveys
- The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: small-scale clustering of Lyman Break Galaxies at z < 1
Cited by in corpus (15)
- Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
- Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite
- A ground-based 21cm Baryon acoustic oscillation survey
- Chameleonic Generalized Brans--Dicke model and late-time acceleration
- Annealing a Follow-up Program: Improvement of the Dark Energy Figure of Merit for Optical Galaxy Cluster Surveys
- Chameleon Field Dynamics During Inflation
- Comparative Analysis of Peculiar Type Ia 1991bg-like Supernovae Spectra
- Designing Decisive Detections
- Stability analysis of agegraphic dark energy in Brans-Dicke cosmology
- Noncommutative Universe and Chameleon Field Dynamics
- Optimising Spectroscopic and Photometric Galaxy Surveys: Efficient Target Selection and Survey Strategy
- Cosmic Acceleration and Geodesic Deviation in Chameleon Scalar Field Model
- Optimizing future dark energy surveys for model selection goals
- Cosmological Solutions of Chameleon Scalar Field Model
- Chameleon Gravity as an Alternative to Dark Matter