Stacked Weak Lensing Mass Calibration: Estimators, Systematics, and Impact on Cosmological Parameter Constraints

Abstract

When extracting the weak lensing shear signal, one may employ either locally normalized or globally normalized shear estimators. The former is the standard approach when estimating cluster masses, while the latter is the more common method among peak finding efforts. While both approaches have identical signal-to-noise in the weak lensing limit, it is possible that higher order corrections or systematics considerations make one estimator preferable over the other. In this paper, we consider the efficacy of both estimators within the context of stacked weak lensing mass estimation in the Dark Energy Survey (DES). We find the two estimators have nearly identical statistical precision, even after including higher order corrections, but that these corrections must be incorporated into the analysis to avoid observationally relevant biases in the recovered masses. We also demonstrate that finite bin-width effects may be significant if not properly accounted for, and that the two estimators exhibit different systematics, particularly with respect to contamination of the source catalog by foreground galaxies. Thus, the two estimators may be employed as a systematics cross-check of each other. Stacked weak lensing in the DES should allow for the mean mass of galaxy clusters to be calibrated to about 2% precision (statistical only), which can improve the figure of merit of the DES cluster abundance experiment by a factor of ~3 relative to the self-calibration expectation. A companion paper (Schmidt & Rozo, 2010) investigates how the two types of estimators considered here impact weak lensing peak finding efforts.

14 pages, 9 figures; comments welcome

References in corpus (13)

• Cluster Constraints on f(R) Gravity
• Combining cluster observables and stacked weak lensing to probe dark energy: Self-calibration of systematic uncertainties
• Constraining the Scatter in the Mass-Richness Relation of maxBCG Clusters With Weak Lensing and X-ray Data
• Precision photometric redshift calibration for galaxy-galaxy weak lensing
• Cosmological Constraints from the Red-Sequence Cluster Survey
• Cross-correlation Weak Lensing of SDSS Galaxy Clusters I: Measurements
• Three Different Types of Galaxy Alignment within Dark Matter Halos
• Lensing Bias in Cosmic Shear
• Size Bias in Galaxy Surveys
• Constraining Dark Energy with Clusters: Complementarity with Other Probes
• The Effects of Halo Assembly Bias on Self-Calibration in Galaxy Cluster Surveys
• Cross-Calibration of Cluster Mass-Observables
• Weak Lensing Peak Finding: Estimators, Filters, and Biases

Cited by in corpus (23)

• Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration
• SPT-3G: A Next-Generation Cosmic Microwave Background Polarization Experiment on the South Pole Telescope
• On the Accuracy of Weak Lensing Cluster Mass Reconstructions
• Weak Lensing Measurement of the Mass--Richness Relation of SDSS redMaPPer Clusters
• Robust Optical Richness Estimation with Reduced Scatter
• A cluster finding algorithm based on the multiband identification of red sequence galaxies
• Optical-to-virial velocity ratios of local disk galaxies from combined kinematics and galaxy-galaxy lensing
• Cluster Mass Calibration at High Redshift: HST Weak Lensing Analysis of 13 Distant Galaxy Clusters from the South Pole Telescope Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Survey
• Mock weak lensing analysis of simulated galaxy clusters: bias and scatter in mass and concentration
• Cluster abundance in chameleon $f(R)$ gravity I: toward an accurate halo mass function prediction
• The Evolution of Dusty Star formation in Galaxy Clusters to z = 1: Spitzer IR Observations of the First Red-Sequence Cluster Survey
• Cosmology with Stacked Cluster Weak Lensing and Cluster-Galaxy Cross-Correlations
• Background sky obscuration by cluster galaxies as a source of systematic error for weak lensing
• Weak Lensing Peak Finding: Estimators, Filters, and Biases
• Detailed SZ study of 19 LoCuSS galaxy clusters: masses and temperatures out to the virial radius
• Covariance matrices for galaxy cluster weak lensing: from virial regime to uncorrelated large-scale structure
• II. Apples to apples $A^2$: cluster selection functions for next-generation surveys
• Cosmology with Galaxy Cluster Phase Spaces
• CoMaLit -- VI. Intrinsic scatter in stacked relations. The weak lensing AMICO galaxy clusters in KiDS-DR3
• Search for gravitational lens candidates in the XMM-LSS/CFHTLS common field
• Weak Lensing Mass Calibration with Shear and Magnification
• Aemulus $\nu$: Precision halo mass functions in w$\nu$CDM cosmologies
• Exploiting Non-linear Scales in Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing and Galaxy Clustering: A Forecast for the Dark Energy Survey