What do cluster counts really tell us about the Universe?

Abstract

We study the covariance matrix of the cluster mass function in cosmology. We adopt a two-line attack: firstly, we employ the counts-in-cells framework to derive an analytic expression for the covariance of the mass function. Secondly, we use a large ensemble of N-body simulations in the LCDM framework to test this. Our theoretical results show that the covariance can be written as the sum of two terms: a Poisson term, which dominates in the limit of rare clusters; and a sample variance term, which dominates for more abundant clusters. Our expressions are analogous to those of Hu & Kravtsov (2003) for multiple cells and a single mass tracer. Calculating the covariance depends on: the mass function and bias of clusters, and the variance of mass fluctuations within the survey volume. The predictions show that there is a strong bin-to-bin covariance between measurements. In terms of the cross-correlation coefficient, we find r~0.5 for haloes with M<3e14 Msol at z=0. Comparison of these predictions with estimates from simulations shows excellent agreement. We use the Fisher matrix formalism to explore the cosmological information content of the counts. We compare the Poisson likelihood model, with the more realistic likelihood model of Lima & Hu (2004), and all terms entering the Fisher matrices are evaluated using the simulations. We find that the Poisson approximation should only be used for the rarest objects, M>3e14 Msol, otherwise the information content of a survey of size V~13.5 [Gpc/h]^3 would be overestimated, resulting in errors that are ~2 times smaller. As an auxiliary result, we show that the bias of clusters, obtained from the cluster-mass cross-variance, is linear on scales >50 Mpc/h, whereas that obtained from the auto-variance is nonlinear.

Replaced with version accepted for publication in MNRAS. Minor corrections: references updated, typos corrected. 20 pages; 10 figures

References in corpus (13)

• Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation
• Transients from Initial Conditions in Cosmological Simulations
• The Scale Dependence of Halo and Galaxy Bias: Effects in Real Space
• LoCuSS: Comparison of Observed X-ray and Lensing Galaxy Cluster Scaling Relations with Simulations
• The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Cosmology from Galaxy Clusters Detected via the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Effect
• Cosmological Constraints from the Red-Sequence Cluster Survey
• LoCuSS: Calibrating Mass-Observable Scaling Relations for Cluster Cosmology with Subaru Weak Lensing Observations
• GaBoDS: The Garching-Bonn Deep Survey -- IX. A sample of 158 shear-selected mass concentration candidates
• Scaling relations and mass calibration of the X-ray luminous galaxy clusters at z~0.2: XMM-Newton observations
• Dark energy constraints from lensing-detected galaxy clusters
• Measuring primordial non-Gaussianity through weak lensing peak counts
• Shear-Selected Clusters From the Deep Lens Survey III: Masses from Weak Lensing
• Cosmological Constraints from a 31 GHz Sky Survey with the Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Array

Cited by in corpus (17)

• The halo mass function through the cosmic ages
• Statistics of extreme objects in the Juropa Hubble Volume simulation
• Toward an accurate mass function for precision cosmology
• Cluster abundance in chameleon $f(R)$ gravity I: toward an accurate halo mass function prediction
• The cosmological information of shear peaks: beyond the abundance
• Optimized detection of shear peaks in weak lensing maps
• Modelling large-scale halo bias using the bispectrum
• The Effective Halo Model: Creating a Physical and Accurate Model of the Matter Power Spectrum and Cluster Counts
• Comparing halo bias from abundance and clustering
• How covariant is the galaxy luminosity function?
• Calibrating Cluster Number Counts with CMB lensing
• Extending the halo mass resolution of $N$-body simulations
• The clustering of dark matter halos: scale-dependent bias on quasi-linear scales
• Why are we still using 3D masses for cluster cosmology?
• Toward optimal cluster power spectrum analysis
• On the universality of the halo mass function beyond $\Lambda$CDM cosmology
• Towards including super-sample covariance in the unbinned likelihood for cluster abundance cosmology