Comparing halo bias from abundance and clustering
arXiv:1503.00313 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stv702
Abstract
We model the abundance of haloes in the volume of the MICE Grand Challenge simulation by fitting the universal mass function with an improved Jack-Knife error covariance estimator that matches theory predictions. We present unifying relations between different fitting models and new predictions for linear () and non-linear ( and ) halo clustering bias. Different mass function fits show strong variations in their performance when including the low mass range () in the analysis. Together with fits from the literature we find an overall variation in the amplitudes of around % in the low mass and up to % in the high mass (galaxy cluster) range (). These variations propagate into a % change in predictions and a % change in or . Despite these strong variations we find universal relations between and or for which we provide simple fits. Excluding low mass haloes, different models fitted with reasonable goodness in this analysis, show percent level agreement in their predictions, but are systematically % lower than the bias directly measured with two-point halo-mass clustering. This result confirms previous findings derived from smaller volumes (and smaller masses). Inaccuracies in the bias predictions lead to % errors in growth measurements. They also affect any HOD fitting or (cluster) mass calibration from clustering measurements.
arXiv comment20 pages, 15 figures, 5 tables, accepted for publication in MNRAS
References in corpus (50)
- The cosmological simulation code GADGET-2
- Large scale bias and the peak background split
- Halo Models of Large Scale Structure
- Toward a halo mass function for precision cosmology: the limits of universality
- Ellipsoidal collapse and an improved model for the number and spatial distribution of dark matter haloes
- Mass function of dark matter halos
- An analytic model for the spatial clustering of dark matter haloes
- Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration
- The Large Scale Bias of Dark Matter Halos: Numerical Calibration and Model Tests
- Merger rates in hierarchical models of galaxy formation. II: Comparison with N-body simulations
- How Many Galaxies Fit in a Halo? Constraints on Galaxy Formation Efficiency from Spatial Clustering
- Precision Determination of the Mass Function of Dark Matter Halos
- Sample Variance Considerations for Cluster Surveys
- Biasing and Hierarchical Statistics in Large-scale Structure
- Statistical Analysis of Galaxy Surveys - I. Robust error estimation for 2-point clustering statistics
- The halo mass function from the dark ages through the present day
- Gravity and Large-Scale Non-local Bias
- The halo mass function through the cosmic ages
- Evidence for Quadratic Tidal Tensor Bias from the Halo Bispectrum
- The mass function
- The Halo Mass Function: High-Redshift Evolution and Universality
- High-Order Correlations of Peaks and Halos: a Step toward Understanding Galaxy Biasing
- Self-Calibration of Cluster Dark Energy Studies: Observable-Mass Distribution
- Understanding higher-order nonlocal halo bias at large scales by combining the power spectrum with the bispectrum
- Cosmology with massive neutrinos II: on the universality of the halo mass function and bias
- Simulating the Universe with MICE: The abundance of massive clusters
- Mass Function Predictions Beyond LCDM
- Galaxy clustering in the CFHTLS-Wide: the changing relationship between galaxies and haloes since z ~ 1.2
- An algorithm to build mock galaxy catalogues using MICE simulations
- Mass Calibration and Cosmological Analysis of the SPT-SZ Galaxy Cluster Sample Using Velocity Dispersion and X-ray Measurements
- The overdensity and masses of the friends-of-friends halos and universality of the halo mass function
- Modeling scale-dependent bias on the baryonic acoustic scale with the statistics of peaks of Gaussian random fields
- Self-Calibration of Cluster Dark Energy Studies: Counts in Cells
- Imprints of dark energy on cosmic structure formation: II) Non-Universality of the halo mass function
- Peak-Background Split, Renormalization, and Galaxy Clustering
- Large scale bias and the inaccuracy of the peak-background split
- Excursion set peaks: a self-consistent model of dark halo abundances and clustering
- Measuring the growth of matter fluctuations with third-order galaxy correlations
- The Local Bias Model in the Large Scale Halo Distribution
- Non-local halo bias with and without massive neutrinos
- Building a Predictive Model of Galaxy Formation - I: Phenomenological Model Constrained to the Stellar Mass Function
- The Impact of Theoretical Uncertainties in the Halo Mass Function and Halo Bias on Precision Cosmology
- Estimating Luminosity Function Constraints from High-Redshift Galaxy Surveys
- How covariant is the galaxy luminosity function?
- Are the halo occupation predictions consistent with large scale galaxy clustering?
- Constraining neutrino properties with a Euclid-like galaxy cluster survey
- Covariance matrices for halo number counts and correlation functions
- What do cluster counts really tell us about the Universe?
- On the equivalence between the effective cosmology and excursion set treatments of environment
- Cluster Probes of Dark Energy Clustering
Cited by in corpus (24)
- Large-Scale Galaxy Bias
- Precision measurement of the local bias of dark matter halos
- Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Methods for Cluster Cosmology and Application to the SDSS
- ICE-COLA: Towards fast and accurate synthetic galaxy catalogues optimizing a quasi -body method
- Halo bias in Lagrangian Space: Estimators and theoretical predictions
- DEMNUni: Massive neutrinos and the bispectrum of large scale structures
- Toward a robust inference method for the galaxy bispectrum: likelihood function and model selection
- Cluster abundance in chameleon gravity I: toward an accurate halo mass function prediction
- The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS): An unbiased estimate of the growth rate of structure at using the clustering of luminous blue galaxies
- Combining cluster number counts and galaxy clustering
- A Redefinition of the Halo Boundary Leads to a Simple yet Accurate Halo Model of Large Scale Structure
- Projected-Field Kinetic Sunyaev-Zel'dovich Cross-Correlations: Halo Model and Forecasts
- What determines large scale galaxy clustering: halo mass or local density?
- Linear and non-linear bias: predictions vs. measurements
- Halo assembly bias from Separate Universe simulations
- Non-local bias contribution to third-order galaxy correlations
- Convolution Lagrangian perturbation theory for biased tracers beyond general relativity
- Inadequacy of internal covariance estimation for super-sample covariance
- Renormalisation of linear halo bias in N-body simulations
- Measuring Linear and Non-linear Galaxy Bias Using Counts-in-Cells in the Dark Energy Survey Science Verification Data
- A Better Way to Define Dark Matter Haloes
- Testing the consistency of three-point halo clustering in Fourier and configuration space
- Cosmological constraints from multiple tracers in spectroscopic surveys
- Comparison of the linear bias models in the light of the Dark Energy Survey