How covariant is the galaxy luminosity function?

Abstract

We investigate the error properties of certain galaxy luminosity function (GLF) estimators. Using a cluster expansion of the density field, we show how, for both volume and flux limited samples, the GLF estimates are covariant. The covariance matrix can be decomposed into three pieces: a diagonal term arising from Poisson noise; a sample variance term arising from large-scale structure in the survey volume; an occupancy covariance term arising due to galaxies of different luminosities inhabiting the same cluster. To evaluate the theory one needs: the mass function and bias of clusters, and the conditional luminosity function (CLF). We use a semi-analytic model (SAM) galaxy catalogue from the Millennium run N-body simulation and the CLF of Yang et al. (2003) to explore these effects. The GLF estimates from the SAM and the CLF qualitatively reproduce results from the 2dFGRS. We also measure the luminosity dependence of clustering in the SAM and find reasonable agreement with 2dFGRS results for bright galaxies. However, for fainter galaxies, L<L*, the SAM overpredicts the relative bias by ~10-20%. We use the SAM data to estimate the errors in the GLF estimates for a volume limited survey of volume V~0.13 [Gpc/h]^3. We find that different luminosity bins are highly correlated: for L<L* the correlation coefficient is r>0.5. Our theory is in good agreement with these measurements. These strong correlations can be attributed to sample variance. For a flux-limited survey of similar volume, the estimates are only slightly less correlated. We explore the importance of these effects for GLF model parameter estimation. We show that neglecting to take into account the bin-to-bin covariances can lead to significant systematic errors in best-fit parameters.

19 pages, 12 figures. Accepted for publication in MNRAS. Refs updated; Fig 6 added; Figs 7 and 10 improved

References in corpus (1)

• Luminosity dependence of the spatial and velocity distributions of galaxies: Semi-analytic models versus the Sloan Digital Sky Survey

Cited by in corpus (24)

• The Galaxy-Halo Connection Over The Last 13.3 Gyrs
• The stellar-to-halo mass relation of GAMA galaxies from 100 square degrees of KiDS weak lensing data
• Connecting massive galaxies to dark matter halos in BOSS - I. Is galaxy color a stochastic process in high-mass halos?
• Cosmological Constraints from a Combination of Galaxy Clustering & Lensing -- II. Fisher Matrix Analysis
• KiDS-1000: Combined halo-model cosmology constraints from galaxy abundance, galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing
• The Synthetic Emission Line COSMOS catalog: H$\alpha$ and [OII] galaxy luminosity functions and counts at $0.3<z<2.5$
• Building a Predictive Model of Galaxy Formation - I: Phenomenological Model Constrained to the $z=0$ Stellar Mass Function
• Comparing halo bias from abundance and clustering
• The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS): Reconstruction of the redshift-space galaxy density field
• On the (Lack of) Evolution of the Stellar Mass Function of Massive Galaxies from $z$=1.5 to 0.4
• RESOLVE and ECO: The Halo Mass-Dependent Shape of Galaxy Stellar and Baryonic Mass Functions
• Constructing mock catalogues for the REFLEX II galaxy cluster sample
• RedMaPPer: Evolution and Mass Dependence of the Conditional Luminosity Functions of Red Galaxies in Galaxy Clusters
• The ALHAMBRA survey : $B-$band luminosity function of quiescent and star-forming galaxies at $0.2\le z<1$ by PDF analysis
• Maturing Satellite Kinematics into a Competitive Probe of the Galaxy-Halo Connection
• Some observational tests of a minimal galaxy formation model
• Towards optimal estimation of the galaxy power spectrum
• J-PLUS: The star formation main sequence and rate density at d < 75 Mpc
• KiDS-Legacy: Covariance validation and the unified OneCovariance framework for projected large-scale structure observables
• The bivariate K-band-submillimetre luminosity functions of the local HRS galaxy sample
• Cosmological model dependence of the galaxy luminosity function: far-infrared results in the Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi model
• The miniJPAS survey. Evolution of the luminosity and stellar mass functions of galaxies up to $z\sim 0.7$
• Covariances of Galaxy Stellar Mass Functions and Correlation Functions
• High redshift galaxies in the ALHAMBRA survey: II. strengthening the evidence of bright-end excess in UV luminosity functions at 2.5 <= z <= 4.5 by PDF analysis