Controlled Tension Forecasting: Quantifying Cross-Probe Biases in ${\omega }_0{\omega }_a$CDM

Abstract

Recent analyses combining DESI DR2 BAO, Planck CMB, and Pantheon+ SNe have reported mild deviations from the \LambdaCDM model. A central challenge is to determine whether these deviations reflect genuine dark-energy evolution or instead arise from cross-probe inconsistencies, prior choices, or mismatches in likelihood construction. Previous work demonstrated that imposing a biased supernova-motivated prior on Ω_{m0} can artificially displace the BAO-inferred (w_0,w_a) values from the \LambdaCDM expectation. A complementary pedagogic study further showed that differing degeneracy geometries among BAO, CMB, and SNe can generate apparent dark-energy evolution even when the underlying cosmology is exactly \LambdaCDM. Here we present a controlled tension-injection framework designed as a simplified mock-based diagnostic tool for studying how selected probe-level inconsistencies propagate into inferred dark-energy parameters. Self-consistent BAO, CMB, and SNe mock datasets are augmented with parameterized shifts in (Ω_{m0}, H_0), supernova absolute calibration, and the BAO sound-horizon scale r_d. The resulting datasets are analyzed through a unified MCMC pipeline, enabling a direct assessment of how these controlled tensions propagate into biases in (w_0,w_a) and the pivot equation-of-state parameter w_p. The results should be interpreted within the restricted setup adopted here: the late-time sector is described in the CPL parametrization and the CMB is represented through compressed distance priors. In this sense, the framework is intended primarily as an illustrative and diagnostic device for identifying probe combinations and degeneracy directions that are more vulnerable to tension-induced dynamical-dark-energy-like shifts, rather than as a parametrization-independent or fully realistic prediction tool.

40 pages, 9 figures, to match the JCAP accepted version

References in corpus (17)

• The trouble with $H_0$
• DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints
• The CosmoVerse White Paper: Addressing observational tensions in cosmology with systematics and fundamental physics
• Systematic Bias in Cosmic Shear: Beyond the Fisher Matrix
• Challenging $\Lambda$CDM: 5$\sigma$ Evidence for a Dynamical Dark Energy Late-Time Transition
• Quintessence and phantoms in light of DESI 2025
• CMB constraints on the early universe independent of late time cosmology
• Testing signatures of phantom crossing through full-shape galaxy clustering analysis
• Cosmological constraints on nonphantom dynamical dark energy with DESI Data Release 2 Baryon Acoustic Oscillations: A 3$\sigma$+ lensing anomaly
• Does DESI DR2 challenge $\Lambda$CDM paradigm ?
• Improved null tests of $\Lambda$CDM and FLRW in light of DESI DR2
• Robust Evidence for Dynamical Dark Energy from DESI Galaxy-CMB Lensing Cross-Correlation and Geometric Probes
• Resolving the Planck-DESI tension by nonminimally coupled quintessence
• Prior-free cosmological parameter estimation of Cosmicflows-4
• The Impact of ${\Omega }_{m0}$ Prior Bias on Cosmological Parameter Estimation: Reconciling DESI DR2 BAO and Pantheon+ SNe Data Combination Results
• Assessing the Robustness of the CPL Parametrization to Basis and Prior Variations: Insights from DESI DR2 BAO Data
• Comparing LambdaCDM, wCDM, and w0waCDM models with DESI DR2 BAO: Redshift-Resolved Diagnostics and the Role of rd