Systematic Bias in Cosmic Shear: Beyond the Fisher Matrix

Abstract

We describe a method for computing the biases that systematic signals introduce in parameter estimation using a simple extension of the Fisher matrix formalism. This allows us to calculate the offset of the best fit parameters relative to the fiducial model, in addition to the usual statistical error ellipse. As an application, we study the impact that residual systematics in tomographic weak lensing measurements. In particular we explore three different types of shape measurement systematics: (i) additive systematic with no redshift evolution; (ii) additive systematic with redshift evolution; and (iii) multiplicative systematic. In each case, we consider a wide range of scale dependence and redshift evolution of the systematics signal. For a future DUNE-like full sky survey, we find that, for cases with mild redshift evolution, the variance of the additive systematic signal should be kept below 10^-7 to ensure biases on cosmological parameters that are sub-dominant to the statistical errors. For the multiplicative systematics, which depends on the lensing signal, we find the multiplicative calibration m0 needs to be controlled to an accuracy better than 10^-3. We find that the impact of systematics can be underestimated if their assumes redshift dependence is too simplistic. We provide simple scaling relations to extend these requirements to any survey geometry and discuss the impact of our results for current and future weak lensing surveys.

Submitted to MNRAS. 11 pages, including 11 figures and 4 tables

References in corpus (4)

• The Shear TEsting Programme 2: Factors affecting high precision weak lensing analyses
• Cosmology with Weak Lensing Surveys
• Optimal Surveys for Weak Lensing Tomography
• PSF calibration requirements for dark energy from cosmic shear

Cited by in corpus (13)

• Constraints on intrinsic alignment contamination of weak lensing surveys using the MegaZ-LRG sample
• Means of confusion: how pixel noise affects shear estimates for weak gravitational lensing
• Bayesian Galaxy Shape Measurement for Weak Lensing Surveys -II. Application to Simulations
• Handbook for the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing
• Interpolating point spread function anisotropy
• Cosmological Systematics Beyond Nuisance Parameters : Form Filling Functions
• The Effects of Halo Assembly Bias on Self-Calibration in Galaxy Cluster Surveys
• Biases on the cosmological parameters and thermal SZ residuals
• Galaxy shear estimation from stacked images
• Characterizing and Propagating Modeling Uncertainties in Photometrically-Derived Redshift Distributions
• Controlling intrinsic-shear alignment in three-point weak lensing statistics
• Summary of the DUNE Mission Concept
• Intrinsic alignment boosting: Direct measurement of intrinsic alignments in cosmic shear data