Shear measurement bias I: dependencies on methods, simulation parameters and measured parameters

Abstract

We present a study of the dependencies of shear bias on simulation (input) and measured (output) parameters, noise, point-spread function anisotropy, pixel size, and the model bias coming from two different and independent galaxy shape estimators. We used simulated images from Galsim based on the GREAT3 control-space-constant branch, and we measured shear bias from a model-fitting method (gFIT) and a moment-based method (Kaiser-Squires-Broadhurst). We show the bias dependencies found on input and output parameters for both methods, and we identify the main dependencies and causes. Most of the results are consistent between the two estimators, an interesting result given the differences of the methods. We also find important dependences on orientation and morphology properties such as flux, size, and ellipticity. We show that noise and pixelization play an important role in the bias dependencies on the output properties and galaxy orientation. We show some examples of model bias that produce a bias dependence on the Sersic index n as well as a different shear bias between galaxies consisting of a single Sersic profile and galaxies with a disc and a bulge. We also see an important coupling between several properties on the bias dependences. Because of this, we need to study several measured properties simultaneously in order to properly understand the nature of shear bias. This paper serves as a first step towards a companion paper that describes a machine learning approach to modelling shear bias as a complex function of many observed properties.

13 pages, 7 figures

References in corpus (13)

• The Canadian Cluster Comparison Project: detailed study of systematics and updated weak lensing masses
• The Shear TEsting Programme 2: Factors affecting high precision weak lensing analyses
• Weak lensing for precision cosmology
• Systematic Bias in Cosmic Shear: Beyond the Fisher Matrix
• Image Analysis for Cosmology: Results from the GREAT10 Galaxy Challenge
• Means of confusion: how pixel noise affects shear estimates for weak gravitational lensing
• Metacalibration: Direct Self-Calibration of Biases in Shear Measurement
• Handbook for the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing
• A study of the sensitivity of shape measurements to the input parameters of weak lensing image simulations
• Euclid Preparation IV. Impact of undetected galaxies on weak-lensing shear measurements
• A highly precise shear bias estimator independent of the measured shape noise
• The Train Wreck Cluster Abell 520 and the Bullet Cluster 1E0657-558 in a Generalized Theory of Gravitation
• Cosmic Shear Bias and Calibration in Cosmic Shear Studies

Cited by in corpus (6)

• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Measuring the Survey Transfer Function with Balrog
• Cosmological Constraint Precision of the Photometric and Spectroscopic Multi-probe Surveys of China Space Station Telescope (CSST)
• Avoiding the Geometric Boundary Effect in Shear Measurement
• Propagating spatially-varying multiplicative shear bias to cosmological parameter estimation for stage-IV weak-lensing surveys
• Euclid preparation. LXVII. Deep learning true galaxy morphologies for weak lensing shear bias calibration
• D${}_4$CNN$\times$AnaCal: Physics-Informed Machine Learning for Accurate and Precise Weak Lensing Shear Estimation