Biases in, and corrections to, KSB shear measurements
arXiv:1006.2470 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17589.x
Abstract
We analyse the KSB method to estimate gravitational shear from surface-brightness moments of small and noisy galaxy images. We identify three potentially problematic assumptions. These are: (1) While gravitational shear must be estimated from averaged galaxy images, KSB derives a shear estimate from each individual image and then takes the average. Since the two operations do not commute, KSB gives biased results. (2) KSB implicitly assumes that galaxy ellipticities are small, while weak gravitational lensing assures only that the change in ellipticity due to the shear is small. (3) KSB does not invert the convolution with the point-spread function, but gives an approximate PSF correction which - even for a circular PSF - holds only in the limit of circular sources. The effects of assumptions (2) and (3) partially counter-act in a way dependent on the width of the weight function and of the PSF. We quantitatively demonstrate the biases due to all assumptions, extend the KSB approach consistently to third order in the shear and ellipticity and show that this extension lowers the biases substantially. The issue of proper PSF deconvolution will be addressed in a forthcoming paper.
12 pages, 10 figures, MNRAS submitted
References in corpus (3)
Cited by in corpus (25)
- Origins of weak lensing systematics, and requirements on future instrumentation (or knowledge of instrumentation)
- The Third Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing (GREAT3) Challenge Handbook
- Means of confusion: how pixel noise affects shear estimates for weak gravitational lensing
- IM3SHAPE: A maximum-likelihood galaxy shear measurement code for cosmic gravitational lensing
- Measurement and Calibration of Noise Bias in Weak Lensing Galaxy Shape Estimation
- Constraints on the Alignment of Galaxies in Galaxy Clusters from 14,000 Spectroscopic Members
- Towards emulating cosmic shear data: Revisiting the calibration of the shear measurements for the Kilo-Degree Survey
- On the Probability Distributions of Ellipticity
- Weak gravitational lensing with DEIMOS
- Mass and Concentration estimates from Weak and Strong Gravitational Lensing: a Systematic Study
- Deep Learning for space-variant deconvolution in galaxy surveys
- Detection of Enhancement in Number Densities of Background Galaxies due to Magnification by Massive Galaxy Clusters
- Fast Weak Lensing Simulations with Halo Model
- A highly precise shear bias estimator independent of the measured shape noise
- Point spread function modelling for astronomical telescopes: a review focused on weak gravitational lensing studies
- Flexion measurement in simulations of Hubble Space Telescope data
- Elliptical Weighted HOLICs for Weak Lensing Shear Measurement part2:PSF correction and application to Abell 370
- Weak-lensing shear estimates with general adaptive moments, and studies of bias by pixellation, PSF distortions, and noise
- Elliptical Weighted HOLICs for Weak Lensing Shear Measurement. part1:Definitions and isotropic PSF correction
- Calibration biases in measurements of weak lensing
- Shear measurement bias I: dependencies on methods, simulation parameters and measured parameters
- Weak lensing using only galaxy position angles
- De-noising the galaxies in the Hubble XDF with EMPCA
- Galaxy Image Restoration with Shape Constraint
- Shear measurement bias II: a fast machine learning calibration method