Shear measurement bias II: a fast machine learning calibration method
arXiv:2006.07011 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202038658
Abstract
We present a new shear calibration method based on machine learning. The method estimates the individual shear responses of the objects from the combination of several measured properties on the images using supervised learning. The supervised learning uses the true individual shear responses obtained from copies of the image simulations with different shear values. On simulated GREAT3data, we obtain a residual bias after the calibration compatible with 0 and beyond Euclid requirements for a signal-to-noise ratio > 20 within ~15 CPU hours of training using only ~10^5 objects. This efficient machine-learning approach can use a smaller data set because the method avoids the contribution from shape noise. The low dimensionality of the input data also leads to simple neural network architectures. We compare it to the recently described method Metacalibration, which shows similar performances. The different methods and systematics suggest that the two methods are very good complementary methods. Our method can therefore be applied without much effort to any survey such as Euclid or the Vera C. Rubin Observatory, with fewer than a million images to simulate to learn the calibration function.
arXiv comment16 pages, 1 table, 13 figures
References in corpus (33)
- KiDS-450: Cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
- LSST Science Book, Version 2.0
- Euclid Definition Study Report
- A Method for Weak Lensing Observations
- The Canadian Cluster Comparison Project: detailed study of systematics and updated weak lensing masses
- Weak lensing for precision cosmology
- Cosmological parameter constraints from galaxy-galaxy lensing and galaxy clustering with the SDSS DR7
- Practical Weak Lensing Shear Measurement with Metacalibration
- Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Weak Lensing Shape Catalogues
- Origins of weak lensing systematics, and requirements on future instrumentation (or knowledge of instrumentation)
- The DES Science Verification Weak Lensing Shear Catalogues
- The Wide Field Infrared Survey Telescope: 100 Hubbles for the 2020s
- GREAT3 results I: systematic errors in shear estimation and the impact of real galaxy morphology
- Image Analysis for Cosmology: Results from the GREAT10 Galaxy Challenge
- Weak lensing shear calibration with simulations of the HSC survey
- Metacalibration: Direct Self-Calibration of Biases in Shear Measurement
- Handbook for the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing
- IM3SHAPE: A maximum-likelihood galaxy shear measurement code for cosmic gravitational lensing
- Shape measurement biases from underfitting and ellipticity gradients
- Measurement and Calibration of Noise Bias in Weak Lensing Galaxy Shape Estimation
- A study of the sensitivity of shape measurements to the input parameters of weak lensing image simulations
- Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing in the DES Science Verification Data
- Image Analysis for Cosmology: Results from the GREAT10 Star Challenge
- Gravitational Lensing Accuracy Testing 2010 (GREAT10) Challenge Handbook
- Cosmic Shears Should Not Be Measured In Conventional Ways
- Sérsic galaxy models in weak lensing shape measurement: model bias, noise bias and their interaction
- Biases in, and corrections to, KSB shear measurements
- Bias-Free Shear Estimation using Artificial Neural Networks
- Cosmic shear measurement with maximum likelihood and maximum a posteriori inference
- The Effects of Calibration on the Bias of Shear Measurements
- Cosmic Shear Bias and Calibration in Cosmic Shear Studies
- Moment-Based Ellipticity Measurement as a Statistical Parameter Estimation Problem
- A simple fitting method (gfit) for galaxy shape measurement in weak lensing surveys