Diversities and similarities exhibited by multi-planetary systems and their architectures: I. Orbital spacings
arXiv:2410.23399 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202451353
Abstract
The rich diversity of multi-planetary systems and their architectures is greatly contrasted by the uniformity exhibited within many of these systems. Previous studies have shown that compact Kepler systems tend to exhibit a peas-in-a-pod architecture: Planets in the same system tend to have similar sizes and masses and be regularly spaced in orbits with low eccentricities and mutual inclinations. This work extends on previous research and examines a larger and more diverse sample comprising all the systems with a minimum of three confirmed planets, resulting in 282 systems and 991 planets. We investigated the system architectures, focusing on the orbital spacings between adjacent planets as well as their relationships with the planets' sizes and masses. We also quantified the similarities of the sizes, masses, and spacings of planets within each system, conducting both intra- and inter-system analyses. Our results corroborate previous research showing that planets orbiting the same star tend to be regularly spaced and that pairs of adjacent planets with radii<1 R_Earth predominantly have orbital period ratios (PRs)<2. In contrast to other studies, we identified a significant similarity of adjacent orbital spacings not only at PRs<4 but also at 1.17<PRs<2662. For the systems with transiting planets, we additionally found that the reported correlation between the PRs and the sizes of adjacent planets disappears when planet pairs with R<1 R_Earth are excluded. Furthermore, we examined the data for possible correlations between the intra-system dispersions of orbital spacings and those of the planetary radii and masses. Our findings indicate that these dispersions are uncorrelated for the systems in which all planet pairs have PRs<6, and even for the compact systems where all PRs<2. Notably, planets in the same system can be similarly spaced even if they do not have similar masses or sizes.
Accepted for publication in A&A. 15 pages and 14 figures
References in corpus (41)
- The California-Kepler Survey. III. A Gap in the Radius Distribution of Small Planets
- The PLATO 2.0 Mission
- Planet Occurrence within 0.25 AU of Solar-type Stars from Kepler
- The Occurrence and Architecture of Exoplanetary Systems
- Prevalence of Earth-size planets orbiting Sun-like stars
- Architecture and Dynamics of Kepler's Candidate Multiple Transiting Planet Systems
- Architecture of Kepler's Multi-transiting Systems: II. New investigations with twice as many candidates
- An asteroseismic view of the radius valley: stripped cores, not born rocky
- The California-Kepler Survey V. Peas in a Pod: Planets in a Kepler Multi-planet System are Similar in Size and Regularly Spaced
- The California-Kepler Survey. I. High Resolution Spectroscopy of 1305 Stars Hosting Kepler Transiting Planets
- Eccentricity from transit photometry: small planets in Kepler multi-planet systems have low eccentricities
- Revisited Mass-Radius relations for exoplanets below 120 Earth masses
- Exoplanet Orbital Eccentricities Derived From LAMOST-Kepler Analysis
- Architecture of Planetary Systems Based on Kepler Data: Number of Planets and Coplanarity
- Validation of Kepler's Multiple Planet Candidates. II: Refined Statistical Framework and Descriptions of Systems of Special Interest
- Kepler Planet Masses and Eccentricities from TTV Analysis
- Occurrence Rates of Planets orbiting FGK Stars: Combining Kepler DR25, Gaia DR2 and Bayesian Inference
- First order resonance overlap and the stability of close two planet systems
- The California-Kepler Survey. II. Precise Physical Properties of 2025 Kepler Planets and Their Host Stars
- Kepler Multi-Planet Systems Exhibit Unexpected Intra-system Uniformity in Mass and Radius
- Architectures of Exoplanetary Systems. I: A Clustered Forward Model for Exoplanetary Systems around Kepler's FGK Stars
- The period ratio distribution of Kepler's candidate multiplanet systems
- Superabundance of Exoplanet Sub-Neptunes Explained by Fugacity Crisis
- An information theoretic framework for classifying exoplanetary system architectures
- The California-Kepler Survey. VI: Kepler Multis and Singles Have Similar Planet and Stellar Properties Indicating a Common Origin
- The New Generation Planetary Population Synthesis (NGPPS). VI. Introducing KOBE: Kepler Observes Bern Exoplanets. Theoretical perspectives on the architecture of planetary systems: Peas in a pod
- The Kepler Peas in a Pod Pattern is Astrophysical
- A framework for the architecture of exoplanetary systems. I. Four classes of planetary system architecture
- Energy Optimization in Extrasolar Planetary Systems: The Transition from Peas-in-a-Pod to Runaway Growth
- Orbital Stability of Multi-Planet Systems: Behavior at High Masses
- The Mass Distribution Function of Planets
- Planetary Population Synthesis and the Emergence of Four Classes of Planetary System Architectures
- Inner Planetary System Gap Complexity is a Predictor of Outer Giant Planets
- Intra-system uniformity: a natural outcome of dynamical sculpting
- Edge-of-the-Multis: Evidence for a Transition in the Outer Architectures of Compact Multi-Planet Systems
- A framework for the architecture of exoplanetary systems. II. Nature versus nurture: Emergent formation pathways of architecture classes
- Pairwise Tidal Equilibrium States and the Architecture of Extrasolar Planetary Systems
- Do planets remember how they formed?
- Generalized Peas-in-a-Pod: Extending Intra-System Mass Uniformity to Non-TTV Systems via the Gini Index
- On the Orbital Spacing Pattern of Kepler Multiple Planet Systems
- Planets similar in size are often dissimilar in interior