Cosmic magnification in beyond-Horndeski gravity
arXiv:2311.04169 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2025/11/007
Abstract
Cosmic magnification is able to probe the geometry of large-scale structure on cosmological scales, thereby providing another window for probing theories of the late-time cosmic acceleration. It holds the potential to reveal new information on the nature of dark energy and modified gravity. By using the angular power spectrum, we investigated cosmic magnification beyond weak lensing (incorporating all known relativistic corrections) in beyond-Horndeski gravitywith both constant phenomenology and dynamic phenomenology, respectively. For both phenomenologies our results show that the total relativistic signal surpasses cosmic variance (considering an SKA2-like sky coverage) in the magnification angular power spectrum at low redshifts (), hence cosmic-variance reduction methods like multi-tracer analysis will not be needed for surveys at the given . For the individual relativistic signals, we found that the Doppler magnification signal also surpasses cosmic variance and remains the dominant signal, at low , for both phenomenologies. However, the integrated-Sachs-Wolfe, the time-delay, and the gravitational (potential) magnification signals, respectively, are subdominant to both the Doppler magnification signal and cosmic variance, at the same ; hence multi-tracer analysis will be needed to isolate these signals. At high redshifts (), the integrated-Sachs-Wolfe, the time-delay, and the gravitational magnification signals, respectively, appear to surpass cosmic variance and dominate over the Doppler magnification signal for constant phenomenology; whereas for dynamic phenomenology, all these signals diminish significantly and are well below cosmic variance, at all (consistent with recent quintessence analysis). Suggesting that including time-variation in the parameters will be crucial in identifying the true signature of the beyond-Horndeski gravity.
20 pages, 11 figures. v3: New results added, major changes, conclusion modified. Version accepted by JCAP (Abstract above is shortened to comply with arXiv's limit.)
References in corpus (58)
- Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
- Dynamics of dark energy
- Modified Gravity and Cosmology
- Dark energy cosmology: the equivalent description via different theoretical models and cosmography tests
- Observational Probes of Cosmic Acceleration
- Early Dark Energy Can Resolve The Hubble Tension
- Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
- Strong constraints on cosmological gravity from GW170817 and GRB 170817A
- Healthy theories beyond Horndeski
- What galaxy surveys really measure
- Exploring gravitational theories beyond Horndeski
- Testing General Relativity in Cosmology
- Maximal freedom at minimum cost: linear large-scale structure in general modifications of gravity
- Fundamental Physics with the Square Kilometre Array
- Large-scale clustering of galaxies in general relativity
- CLASH: Joint Analysis of Strong-Lensing, Weak-Lensing Shear and Magnification Data for 20 Galaxy Clusters
- A unifying description of dark energy
- Constraining ultra large-scale cosmology with multiple tracers in optical and radio surveys
- Hunting down horizon-scale effects with multi-wavelength surveys
- Hints of Nonminimally Coupled Gravity in DESI 2024 Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements
- Cosmological parameter constraints for Horndeski scalar-tensor gravity
- Why multi-tracer surveys beat cosmic variance
- Matching current observational constraints with nonminimally coupled dark energy
- Testing Gravity Using Galaxy Clusters: New Constraints on Beyond Horndeski Theories
- Dark-Energy Instabilities induced by Gravitational Waves
- Effect of Peculiar Motion in Weak Lensing
- Isolating relativistic effects in large-scale structure
- Assessing cosmological evidence for non-minimal coupling
- On the complementarity of galaxy clustering with cosmic shear and flux magnification
- Cosmology with Doppler Lensing
- Probing the imprint of interacting dark energy on very large scales
- Size Bias in Galaxy Surveys
- Mapping dark matter with cosmic magnification
- Shear and Magnification: Cosmic Complementarity
- Obtaining Precision Constraints on Modified Gravity with Helioseismology
- Simulated multi-tracer analyses with HI intensity mapping
- Precision measurement of cosmic magnification from 21 cm emitting galaxies
- Observational biases in flux magnification measurements
- Magnification Bias Corrections to Galaxy-Lensing Cross-Correlations
- Semi-dynamical perturbations of unified dark energy
- On the dangers of using the growth equation on large scales in the Newtonian gauge
- Clustering of quintessence on horizon scales and its imprint on HI intensity mapping
- Searching for dark energy with the Sun
- Probing the speed of gravity with LVK, LISA, and joint observations
- Multi-tracer power spectra and bispectra: Formalism
- New Early Dark Energy as a solution to the and tensions
- Magnification bias as a novel probe for primordial magnetic fields
- Non-oscillating Early Dark Energy and Quintessence from Alpha-Attractors
- Wide-angle effects in multi-tracer power spectra with Doppler corrections
- A multitracer analysis for the eBOSS galaxy sample based on the effective field theory of large-scale structure
- Testing General Relativity with the Doppler magnification effect
- Dark energy homogeneity in general relativity: Are we applying it correctly?
- Large-scale imprint of relativistic effects in the cosmic magnification
- Exploiting magnification bias in ultradeep submillimetre-wave surveys using ALMA
- Imprint of f(R) gravity in the cosmic magnification
- Which is a better cosmological probe: Number counts or cosmic magnification?
- A Generalized Method for Measuring Weak Lensing Magnification With Weighted Number Counts
- Investigating the imprint of quintessence in cosmic magnification