Magnification Bias Corrections to Galaxy-Lensing Cross-Correlations
arXiv:0809.3101 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.78.123517
Abstract
Galaxy-galaxy or galaxy-quasar lensing can provide important information on the mass distribution in the Universe. It consists of correlating the lensing signal (either shear or magnification) of a background galaxy/quasar sample with the number density of a foreground galaxy sample. However, the foreground galaxy density is inevitably altered by the magnification bias due to the mass between the foreground and the observer, leading to a correction to the observed galaxy-lensing signal. The aim of this paper is to quantify this correction. The single most important determining factor is the foreground redshift z: the correction is small if the foreground galaxies are at low redshifts but can become non-negligible for sufficiently high redshifts. For instance, we find that for the multipole l=1000, the correction is above 1%*(5s-2)/b for z<0.37, and above 5%*(5s-2)/b for z<0.67, where s is the number count slope of the foreground sample, and b its galaxy bias. These considerations are particularly important for geometrical measures, such as the Jain and Taylor ratio or its generalization by Zhang et al. Assuming (5s-2)/b=1, we find that the foreground redshift should be limited to z<0.45 in order to avoid biasing the inferred dark energy equation of state w by more than 5%, and that even for a low foreground redshift (< 0.45), the background samples must be well separated from the foreground to avoid incurring a bias of similar magnitude. Lastly, we briefly comment on the possibility of obtaining these geometrical measures without using galaxy shapes, using instead magnification bias itself.
10 pages, 7 figures; v2: minor revisions, as accepted for publication in Physical Review D
References in corpus (22)
- Weak Gravitational Lensing
- Baryonic Features in the Matter Transfer Function
- Stable clustering, the halo model and nonlinear cosmological power spectra
- Cross-correlation Tomography: Measuring Dark Energy Evolution with Weak Lensing
- Systematic errors in weak lensing: application to SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing
- The Galaxy-mass Correlation Function Measured from Weak Lensing in the SDSS
- Mapping Cluster Mass Distributions via Gravitational Lensing of Background Galaxies
- Density profiles of galaxy groups and clusters from SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing
- Detection of Cosmic Magnification with the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
- The Scale Dependence of Halo and Galaxy Bias: Effects in Real Space
- Virial masses of galactic halos from galaxy-galaxy lensing: theoretical modeling and application to SDSS
- Dark Energy Constraints from Weak Lensing Cross-Correlation Cosmography
- Probing dark energy with the shear-ratio geometric test
- Anisotropic Magnification Distortion of the 3D Galaxy Correlation: I. Real Space
- Galaxy-dark matter correlations applied to galaxy-galaxy lensing: predictions from the semi-analytic galaxy formation models
- Cosmological Information from Quasar-Galaxy Correlations induced by Weak Lensing
- Isolating Geometry in Weak Lensing Measurements
- Quasar-Galaxy and Galaxy-Galaxy Cross-Correlations: Model Predictions with Realistic Galaxies
- Correlation between galaxies and QSO in the SDSS:na signal from gravitational lensing magnification?
- Clustering of Galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field
- Lensing Corrections to Features in the Angular Two-Point Correlation Function and Power Spectrum
- Precision Studies of Dark Energy with LSST
Cited by in corpus (29)
- Ray-tracing through the Millennium Simulation: Born corrections and lens-lens coupling in cosmic shear and galaxy-galaxy lensing
- The MICE Grand Challenge Lightcone Simulation III: Galaxy lensing mocks from all-sky lensing maps
- Lensing Bias in Cosmic Shear
- The Accuracy of Weak Lensing Simulations
- Cross-Correlation of Planck CMB Lensing with DESI-Like LRGs
- Controlling and leveraging small-scale information in tomographic galaxy-galaxy lensing
- Magnification effect on the detection of primordial non-Gaussianity from photometric surveys
- Magnification bias in galaxy surveys with complex sample selection functions
- The importance of magnification effects in galaxy-galaxy lensing
- Scale dependence of galaxy biasing investigated by weak gravitational lensing: An assessment using semi-analytic galaxies and simulated lensing data
- Weak lensing in the Horizon-AGN simulation lightcone. Small scale baryonic effects
- Probing galaxy bias and intergalactic gas pressure with KiDS Galaxies-tSZ-CMB lensing cross-correlations
- Robust Evidence for Dynamical Dark Energy from DESI Galaxy-CMB Lensing Cross-Correlation and Geometric Probes
- Magnification bias as a novel probe for primordial magnetic fields
- General Relativistic corrections in density-shear correlations
- Large-scale imprint of relativistic effects in the cosmic magnification
- Accurate Measurement of the Lensing Magnification by BOSS CMASS Galaxies and Its Implications for Cosmology and Dark Matter
- Magnification bias in the shear-ratio test: a viable mitigation strategy
- Imprint of f(R) gravity in the cosmic magnification
- Cosmic star formation history with tomographic cosmic infrared background-galaxy cross-correlation
- Which is a better cosmological probe: Number counts or cosmic magnification?
- Impact of lensing magnification on the analysis of galaxy clustering in redshift space
- Hawaii Two-0: High-redshift galaxy clustering and bias
- Understanding the relativistic overdensity of galaxy surveys
- Prospects for cosmic magnification measurements using HI intensity mapping
- Challenges in Cosmic Magnification Reconstruction by Magnification Response
- Probing gravity with the DES-CMASS sample and BOSS spectroscopy
- Investigating the imprint of quintessence in cosmic magnification
- Cosmic magnification in beyond-Horndeski gravity