The importance of magnification effects in galaxy-galaxy lensing

Abstract

Magnification changes the observed number counts of galaxies on the sky. This biases the observed tangential shear profiles around galaxies, the so-called galaxy-galaxy lensing (GGL) signal, and the related excess mass profile. Correspondingly, inference of physical quantities, such as the mean mass profile of halos around galaxies, are affected by magnification effects. We use simulated shear and galaxy data of the Millennium Simulation to quantify the effect on shear and mass estimates from magnified lens and source number counts. The former are due to the large-scale matter distribution in the foreground of the lenses, the latter are caused by magnification of the source population by the matter associated with the lenses. The GGL signal is calculated from the simulations by an efficient fast-Fourier transform that can also be applied to real data. The numerical treatment is complemented by a leading-order analytical description of the magnification effects, which is shown to fit the numerical shear data well. We find the magnification effect is strongest for steep galaxy luminosity functions and high redshifts. For a lens redshift of $z_{\mathrm{d}}=0.83$, a limiting magnitude of $22\mathrm{mag}$ in the $r$-band and a source redshift of $z_{\mathrm{s}}=0.99$, we find that a magnification correction changes the shear profile up to $45\%$ and the mass is biased by up to $55\%$. For medium-redshift galaxies the relative change in shear and mass is typically a few percent. As expected, the sign of the bias depends on the local slope of the lens luminosity function ${\alpha }_{\mathrm{d}}$, where the mass is biased low for ${\alpha }_{\mathrm{d}}<1$ and biased high for ${\alpha }_{\mathrm{d}}>1$. Whereas the magnification effect of sources is rarely than more $1\%$, the statistical power of future weak lensing surveys warrants correction for this effect.

this version fixes a typo in the prefactor of equation (14)

References in corpus (2)

• The Intrinsic Alignment of Galaxies and its Impact on Weak Gravitational Lensing in an Era of Precision Cosmology
• Magnification Bias Corrections to Galaxy-Lensing Cross-Correlations

Cited by in corpus (23)

• KiDS-1000 Methodology: Modelling and inference for joint weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering analysis
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Measuring the Survey Transfer Function with Balrog
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: High-precision measurement and modeling of galaxy-galaxy lensing
• Euclid preparation: XIX. Impact of magnification on photometric galaxy clustering
• Persistent homology in cosmic shear: constraining parameters with topological data analysis
• KiDS-1000: Combined halo-model cosmology constraints from galaxy abundance, galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing
• Cosmological Constraint Precision of the Photometric and Spectroscopic Multi-probe Surveys of China Space Station Telescope (CSST)
• Testing gravity using galaxy-galaxy lensing and clustering amplitudes in KiDS-1000, BOSS and 2dFLenS
• KiDS-1000: Constraints on the intrinsic alignment of luminous red galaxies
• Magnification bias in galaxy surveys with complex sample selection functions
• On cosmological bias due to the magnification of shear and position samples in modern weak lensing analyses
• DESI Legacy Imaging Surveys Data Release 9: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing using the Minimal Bias Model
• Magnification Bias Estimators for Realistic Surveys: an Application to the BOSS Survey
• Constraining gravity with a new precision $E_G$ estimator using Planck + SDSS BOSS
• An adapted filter function for density split statistics in weak lensing
• Euclid and KiDS-1000: Quantifying the impact of source-lens clustering on cosmic shear analyses
• Euclid preparation. LII. Forecast impact of super-sample covariance on 3x2pt analysis with Euclid
• Impact of lensing magnification on the analysis of galaxy clustering in redshift space
• Precise self-calibration of interloper bias in spectroscopic surveys
• CFHTLenS: Galaxy bias as function of scale, stellar mass, and colour. Conflicts with predictions by semi-analytic models
• Intrinsic correlations of galaxy sizes in a hydrodynamical cosmological simulation
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Galaxy-halo connection from galaxy-galaxy lensing
• Lensing Without Borders. I. A Blind Comparison of the Amplitude of Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing Between Independent Imaging Surveys