Lensing Without Borders. I. A Blind Comparison of the Amplitude of Galaxy-Galaxy Lensing Between Independent Imaging Surveys

Abstract

Lensing Without Borders is a cross-survey collaboration created to assess the consistency of galaxy-galaxy lensing signals ($\Delta \Sigma$) across different data-sets and to carry out end-to-end tests of systematic errors. We perform a blind comparison of the amplitude of $\Delta \Sigma$ using lens samples from BOSS and six independent lensing surveys. We find good agreement between empirically estimated and reported systematic errors which agree to better than 2.3$\sigma$ in four lens bins and three radial ranges. For lenses with $z_{\mathrm{L}}>0.43$ and considering statistical errors, we detect a 3-4$\sigma$ correlation between lensing amplitude and survey depth. This correlation could arise from the increasing impact at higher redshift of unrecognised galaxy blends on shear calibration and imperfections in photometric redshift calibration. At $z_{\mathrm{L}}>0.54$ amplitudes may additionally correlate with foreground stellar density. The amplitude of these trends is within survey-defined systematic error budgets which are designed to include known shear and redshift calibration uncertainty. Using a fully empirical and conservative method, we do not find evidence for large unknown systematics. Systematic errors greater than 15% (25%) ruled out in three lens bins at 68% (95%) confidence at $z<0.54$. Differences with respect to predictions based on clustering are observed to be at the 20-30% level. Our results therefore suggest that lensing systematics alone are unlikely to fully explain the "lensing is low" effect at $z<0.54$. This analysis demonstrates the power of cross-survey comparisons and provides a promising path for identifying and reducing systematics in future lensing analyses.

41 page, 20 figures

References in corpus (24)

• The 2.5 m Telescope of the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
• Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Likelihoods and Parameters from the WMAP data
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
• Wide-Field InfrarRed Survey Telescope-Astrophysics Focused Telescope Assets WFIRST-AFTA 2015 Report
• Galaxies in the Hubble Ultra Deep Field: I. Detection, Multiband Photometry, Photometric Redshifts, and Morphology
• The Shear TEsting Programme 2: Factors affecting high precision weak lensing analyses
• 4MOST: Project overview and information for the First Call for Proposals
• The clustering of galaxies in the completed SDSS-III Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey: Observational systematics and baryon acoustic oscillations in the correlation function
• The Zurich Extragalactic Bayesian Redshift Analyzer (ZEBRA) and its first application: COSMOS
• Density profiles of galaxy groups and clusters from SDSS galaxy-galaxy weak lensing
• Lensing is Low: Cosmology, Galaxy Formation, or New Physics?
• Estimating the Redshift Distribution of Faint Galaxy Samples
• CARS: the CFHTLS-Archive-Research Survey; I. Five-band multi-colour data from 37 sq. deg. CFHTLS-Wide observations
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Multi-Probe Methodology and Simulated Likelihood Analyses
• Handbook for the GREAT08 Challenge: An image analysis competition for cosmological lensing
• Open statistical issues in particle physics
• Separating intrinsic alignment and galaxy-galaxy lensing
• Mass and galaxy distributions of four massive galaxy clusters from Dark Energy Survey Science Verification data
• GaBoDS: The Garching-Bonn Deep Survey -- II. Confirmation of EIS cluster candidates by weak gravitational lensing
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cross-Correlation Redshifts in the DES -- Calibration of the Weak Lensing Source Redshift Distributions
• On the halo-mass and radial scale dependence of the lensing is low effect
• Magnification bias in galaxy surveys with complex sample selection functions
• CFHTLenS: A Weak Lensing Shear Analysis of the 3D-Matched-Filter Galaxy Clusters
• Background sky obscuration by cluster galaxies as a source of systematic error for weak lensing

Cited by in corpus (1)

• The galaxy formation origin of the lensing is low problem