On cosmological bias due to the magnification of shear and position samples in modern weak lensing analyses

Abstract

The magnification of galaxies in modern galaxy surveys induces additional correlations in the cosmic shear, galaxy-galaxy lensing and clustering observables used in modern lensing "3x2pt" analyses, due to sample selection. In this paper, we emulate the magnification contribution to all three observables utilising the SLICS simulations suite, and test the sensitivity of the cosmological model, galaxy bias and redshift distribution calibration to un-modelled magnification in a Stage-IV-like survey using Monte-Carlo sampling. We find that magnification cannot be ignored in any single or combined observable, with magnification inducing $>1\sigma$ biases in the $w_0-{\sigma }_8$ plane, including for cosmic shear and 3x2pt analyses. Significant cosmological biases exist in the 3x2pt and cosmic shear from magnification of the shear sample alone. We show that magnification induces significant biases in the mean of the redshift distribution where a position sample is analysed, which may potentially be used to identify contamination by magnification.

arXiv comment17 pages, 7 figures, 3 tables. Submitted to MNRAS. Comments welcome

References in corpus (45)

• SciPy 1.0--Fundamental Algorithms for Scientific Computing in Python
• emcee: The MCMC Hammer
• MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics
• The Cosmic Linear Anisotropy Solving System (CLASS) II: Approximation schemes
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
• Revising the Halofit Model for the Nonlinear Matter Power Spectrum
• KiDS-1000 Cosmology: Multi-probe weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering constraints
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Modeling Uncertainty
• The Skewness of the Aperture Mass Statistic
• Core Cosmology Library: Precision Cosmological Predictions for LSST
• Fast likelihood-free cosmology with neural density estimators and active learning
• Simultaneous measurement of cosmology and intrinsic alignments using joint cosmic shear and galaxy number density correlations
• The Effective Number Density of Galaxies for Weak Lensing Measurements in the LSST Project
• High Performance P3M N-body code: CUBEP3M
• KiDS-1000 Methodology: Modelling and inference for joint weak gravitational lensing and spectroscopic galaxy clustering analysis
• Generalized massive optimal data compression
• Towards emulating cosmic shear data: Revisiting the calibration of the shear measurements for the Kilo-Degree Survey
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the MagLim lens sample
• Cosmological Measurements with General Relativistic Galaxy Correlations
• Cosmological Simulations for Combined-Probe Analyses: Covariance and Neighbour-Exclusion Bias
• Simulations of Weak Gravitational Lensing - II : Including Finite Support Effects in Cosmic Shear Covariance Matrices
• On the complementarity of galaxy clustering with cosmic shear and flux magnification
• Lensing Bias in Cosmic Shear
• The impact of relativistic effects on cosmological parameter estimation
• Cosmic Shear Covariance Matrix in $w$CDM: Cosmology Matters
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: High-precision measurement and modeling of galaxy-galaxy lensing
• Euclid preparation: XIX. Impact of magnification on photometric galaxy clustering
• The skewed weak lensing likelihood: why biases arise, despite data and theory being sound
• Lensing convergence and the neutrino mass scale in galaxy redshift surveys
• Cosmic Shear: Inference from Forward Models
• Observational biases in flux magnification measurements
• The importance of magnification effects in galaxy-galaxy lensing
• Euclid: The reduced shear approximation and magnification bias for Stage IV cosmic shear experiments
• Background sky obscuration by cluster galaxies as a source of systematic error for weak lensing
• Mitigating Systematic Errors in Angular Correlation Function Measurements from Wide Field Surveys
• Disentangling magnification in combined shear-clustering analyses
• Non-Gaussianity in the Weak Lensing Correlation Function Likelihood -- Implications for Cosmological Parameter Biases
• Lensing convergence in galaxy clustering in LambdaCDM and beyond
• Cluster Lensing Profiles Derived from a Redshift Enhancement of Magnified BOSS-Survey Galaxies
• Developing a unified pipeline for large-scale structure data analysis with angular power spectra -- II. A case study for magnification bias and radio continuum surveys
• Multi-wavelength spectroscopic probes: biases from neglecting light-cone effects
• Sufficiency of a Gaussian power spectrum likelihood for accurate cosmology from upcoming weak lensing surveys
• Post-Limber Weak Lensing Bispectrum, Reduced Shear Correction, and Magnification Bias Correction
• The impact of signal-to-noise, redshift, and angular range on the bias of weak lensing 2-point functions

Cited by in corpus (11)

• Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission
• Cosmological Constraint Precision of the Photometric and Spectroscopic Multi-probe Surveys of China Space Station Telescope (CSST)
• Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Magnification modeling and impact on cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing
• Magnification Bias Estimators for Realistic Surveys: an Application to the BOSS Survey
• Constraining gravity with a new precision $E_G$ estimator using Planck + SDSS BOSS
• Accuracy requirements on intrinsic alignments for Stage-IV cosmic shear
• Euclid and KiDS-1000: Quantifying the impact of source-lens clustering on cosmic shear analyses
• Magnification and evolution bias of transient sources: GWs and SNIa
• Intrinsic correlations of galaxy sizes in a hydrodynamical cosmological simulation
• Challenges in Cosmic Magnification Reconstruction by Magnification Response
• Euclid: Optimising tomographic redshift binning for 3$\times$2pt power spectrum constraints on dark energy