On cosmological bias due to the magnification of shear and position samples in modern weak lensing analyses
arXiv:2111.09867 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stac1809
Abstract
The magnification of galaxies in modern galaxy surveys induces additional correlations in the cosmic shear, galaxy-galaxy lensing and clustering observables used in modern lensing "3x2pt" analyses, due to sample selection. In this paper, we emulate the magnification contribution to all three observables utilising the SLICS simulations suite, and test the sensitivity of the cosmological model, galaxy bias and redshift distribution calibration to un-modelled magnification in a Stage-IV-like survey using Monte-Carlo sampling. We find that magnification cannot be ignored in any single or combined observable, with magnification inducing biases in the plane, including for cosmic shear and 3x2pt analyses. Significant cosmological biases exist in the 3x2pt and cosmic shear from magnification of the shear sample alone. We show that magnification induces significant biases in the mean of the redshift distribution where a position sample is analysed, which may potentially be used to identify contamination by magnification.
17 pages, 7 figures, 3 tables. Submitted to MNRAS. Comments welcome
References in corpus (13)
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: Cosmology from Cosmic Shear and Robustness to Modeling Uncertainty
- Fast likelihood-free cosmology with neural density estimators and active learning
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing using the MagLim lens sample
- Simulations of Weak Gravitational Lensing - II : Including Finite Support Effects in Cosmic Shear Covariance Matrices
- Lensing Bias in Cosmic Shear
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 Results: High-precision measurement and modeling of galaxy-galaxy lensing
- Euclid preparation: XIX. Impact of magnification on photometric galaxy clustering
- Background sky obscuration by cluster galaxies as a source of systematic error for weak lensing
- Multi-wavelength spectroscopic probes: biases from neglecting light-cone effects
- Sufficiency of a Gaussian power spectrum likelihood for accurate cosmology from upcoming weak lensing surveys
- Post-Limber Weak Lensing Bispectrum, Reduced Shear Correction, and Magnification Bias Correction
- The impact of signal-to-noise, redshift, and angular range on the bias of weak lensing 2-point functions
Cited by in corpus (11)
- Euclid. I. Overview of the Euclid mission
- Cosmological Constraint Precision of the Photometric and Spectroscopic Multi-probe Surveys of China Space Station Telescope (CSST)
- Dark Energy Survey Year 3 results: Magnification modeling and impact on cosmological constraints from galaxy clustering and galaxy-galaxy lensing
- Magnification Bias Estimators for Realistic Surveys: an Application to the BOSS Survey
- Constraining gravity with a new precision estimator using Planck + SDSS BOSS
- Accuracy requirements on intrinsic alignments for Stage-IV cosmic shear
- Euclid and KiDS-1000: Quantifying the impact of source-lens clustering on cosmic shear analyses
- Magnification and evolution bias of transient sources: GWs and SNIa
- Intrinsic correlations of galaxy sizes in a hydrodynamical cosmological simulation
- Challenges in Cosmic Magnification Reconstruction by Magnification Response
- Euclid: Optimising tomographic redshift binning for 32pt power spectrum constraints on dark energy