A reversed form of public goods game: equivalence and difference

Abstract

According to the public goods game (PGG) protocol, participants decide freely whether they want to contribute to a common pool or not, but the resulting benefit is distributed equally. A conceptually similar dilemma situation may emerge when participants consider if they claim a common resource but the related cost is covered equally by all group members. The latter establishes a reversed form of the original public goods game (R-PGG). In this work, we show that R-PGG is equivalent to PGG in several circumstances, starting from the traditional analysis, via the evolutionary approach in unstructured populations, to Monte Carlo simulations in structured populations. However, there are also cases when the behavior of R-PGG could be surprisingly different from the outcome of PGG. When the key parameters are heterogeneous, for instance, the results of PGG and R-PGG could be diverse even if we apply the same amplitudes of heterogeneity. We find that the heterogeneity in R-PGG generally impedes cooperation, while the opposite is observed for PGG. These diverse system reactions can be understood if we follow how payoff functions change when introducing heterogeneity in the parameter space. This analysis also reveals the distinct roles of cooperator and defector strategies in the mentioned games. Our observations may hopefully stimulate further research to check the potential differences between PGG and R-PGG due to the alternative complexity of conditions.

30 pages, 11 figures, accepted for publication in New Journal of Physics

References in corpus (11)

• Statistical physics of human cooperation
• Evolutionary dynamics of group interactions on structured populations: A review
• Social diversity and promotion of cooperation in the spatial prisoner's dilemma game
• Reward and cooperation in the spatial public goods game
• Defense mechanisms of empathetic players in the spatial ultimatum game
• Cooperative Behavior in a Model of Evolutionary Snowdrift Games with $N$-person Interactions
• Blocking defector invasion by focusing on the most successful partner
• Involution game with spatio-temporal heterogeneity of social resources
• Inter-groups information exchange drives Cooperation in the Public Goods Game
• Indirect exclusion can promote cooperation in repeated group interactions
• Small Fraction of Selective Cooperators Can Elevate General Wellbeing Significantly

Cited by in corpus (6)

• Evolutionary dynamics in stochastic nonlinear public goods games
• Reputation-based synergy and discounting mechanism promotes cooperation
• When greediness and self-confidence meet in a social dilemma
• Heterogeneous contributions can jeopardize cooperation in the Public Goods Game
• Competition between self- and other-regarding preferences in resolving social dilemmas
• Punishment in bipartite societies