The challenges of changing teaching assistants' grading practices: Requiring students to show evidence of understanding
arXiv:2102.07295 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2017-0030
Abstract
Teaching assistants (TAs) are often responsible for grading in introductory physics courses at large research universities. Their grading practices can shape students' approaches to problem solving and learning. Physics education research recommends grading practices that encourage students to provide evidence of understanding via explication of the problem-solving process. However, TAs may not necessarily grade in a manner that encourages students to provide evidence of understanding in their solutions. Within the context of a semester-long TA professional development course, we investigated whether encouraging TAs to use a grading rubric that appropriately weights the problem-solving process and having them reflect upon the benefits of using such a rubric prompts TAs to require evidence of understanding in student solutions. We examined how the TAs graded realistic student solutions to introductory physics problems before they were provided a rubric, whether TAs used the rubric as intended, whether they were consistent in grading similar solutions, and how TAs' grading criteria changed after discussing the benefits of a well-designed rubric. We find that many TAs typically applied the rubric consistently when grading similar student solutions but did not require students to provide evidence of understanding. TAs' written responses, class discussions, and individual interviews suggest that the instructional activities involving the grading rubrics in this study were not sufficient to change their grading practices. Interviews and class discussions suggest that helping TAs value a rubric that appropriately weights the problem-solving process may be challenging partly due to the TAs past educational experiences and the departmental context.
arXiv comment18 pages
References in corpus (20)
- When physical intuition fails
- Assessing Student Expertise in Introductory Physics with Isomorphic Problems, Part II: Effect of Some Potential Factors on Problem Solving and Transfer
- Helping students learn effective problem solving strategies by reflecting with peers
- Using Isomorphic Problems to Learn Introductory Physics
- Assessing Student Expertise in Introductory Physics with Isomorphic Problems, Part I: Performance on Non-intuitive Problem Pair from Introductory Physics
- Improving performance in quantum mechanics with explicit incentives to correct mistakes
- Using Categorization of Problems as an Instructional Tool to Help Introductory Students Learn Physics
- Categorization of problems to assess and improve proficiency as teachers and learners
- Challenges in Analogical Reasoning
- Learning from mistakes: The effect of students' written self-diagnoses on subsequent problem solving
- Teaching assistants' beliefs regarding example solutions in introductory physics
- Performance of Graduate Students at Identifying Introductory Physics Students' Difficulties Related to Kinematics Graphs
- Physics graduate teaching assistants' beliefs about a grading rubric: Lessons learned
- Instructional Goals and Grading Practices of Graduate Students after One Semester of Teaching Experience
- Rethinking Tools for Training Teaching Assistants
- Physics postgraduate teaching assistants' grading approaches: Conflicting goals and practices
- TA-designed vs. research-oriented problem solutions
- The group administered interactive questionnaire: An alternative to individual interviews
- Grading Practices and Considerations of Graduate Students at the Beginning of their Teaching Assignment
- Graduate teaching assistants use different criteria when grading introductory physics vs. quantum mechanics problems