BlockHammer: Preventing RowHammer at Low Cost by Blacklisting Rapidly-Accessed DRAM Rows
arXiv:2102.05981 · doi:10.1109/HPCA51647.2021.00037
Abstract
Aggressive memory density scaling causes modern DRAM devices to suffer from RowHammer, a phenomenon where rapidly activating a DRAM row can cause bit-flips in physically-nearby rows. Recent studies demonstrate that modern DRAM chips, including chips previously marketed as RowHammer-safe, are even more vulnerable to RowHammer than older chips. Many works show that attackers can exploit RowHammer bit-flips to reliably mount system-level attacks to escalate privilege and leak private data. Therefore, it is critical to ensure RowHammer-safe operation on all DRAM-based systems. Unfortunately, state-of-the-art RowHammer mitigation mechanisms face two major challenges. First, they incur increasingly higher performance and/or area overheads when applied to more vulnerable DRAM chips. Second, they require either proprietary information about or modifications to the DRAM chip design. In this paper, we show that it is possible to efficiently and scalably prevent RowHammer bit-flips without knowledge of or modification to DRAM internals. We introduce BlockHammer, a low-cost, effective, and easy-to-adopt RowHammer mitigation mechanism that overcomes the two key challenges by selectively throttling memory accesses that could otherwise cause RowHammer bit-flips. The key idea of BlockHammer is to (1) track row activation rates using area-efficient Bloom filters and (2) use the tracking data to ensure that no row is ever activated rapidly enough to induce RowHammer bit-flips. By doing so, BlockHammer (1) makes it impossible for a RowHammer bit-flip to occur and (2) greatly reduces a RowHammer attack's impact on the performance of co-running benign applications. Compared to state-of-the-art RowHammer mitigation mechanisms, BlockHammer provides competitive performance and energy when the system is not under a RowHammer attack and significantly better performance and energy when the system is under attack.
A shorter version of this work is to appear at the 27th IEEE International Symposium on High-Performance Computer Architecture (HPCA-27), 2021
References in corpus (4)
- Improving DRAM Performance by Parallelizing Refreshes with Accesses
- BlockHammer: Preventing RowHammer at Low Cost by Blacklisting Rapidly-Accessed DRAM Rows
- Terminal Brain Damage: Exposing the Graceless Degradation in Deep Neural Networks Under Hardware Fault Attacks
- A Modern Primer on Processing in Memory
Cited by in corpus (9)
- BlockHammer: Preventing RowHammer at Low Cost by Blacklisting Rapidly-Accessed DRAM Rows
- A Deeper Look into RowHammer`s Sensitivities: Experimental Analysis of Real DRAM Chips and Implications on Future Attacks and Defenses
- Fundamentally Understanding and Solving RowHammer
- Benchmarking a New Paradigm: An Experimental Analysis of a Real Processing-in-Memory Architecture
- Scalable and Secure Row-Swap: Efficient and Safe Row Hammer Mitigation in Memory Systems
- QPRAC: Towards Secure and Practical PRAC-based Rowhammer Mitigation using Priority Queues
- DAPPER: A Performance-Attack-Resilient Tracker for RowHammer Defense
- Per-Row Activation Counting on Real Hardware: Demystifying Performance Overheads
- SIMDRAM: An End-to-End Framework for Bit-Serial SIMD Computing in DRAM