Dynamics of Atomic Steps on GaN (0001) during Vapor Phase Epitaxy

Abstract

Images of the morphology of GaN (0001) surfaces often show half-unit-cell-height steps separating a sequence of terraces having alternating large and small widths. This can be explained by the $\alpha \beta \alpha \beta$ stacking sequence of the wurtzite crystal structure, which results in steps with alternating $A$ and $B$ edge structures for the lowest energy step azimuths, i.e. steps normal to $[01\bar{1}0]$ type directions. Predicted differences in the adatom attachment kinetics at $A$ and $B$ steps would lead to alternating $\alpha$ and $\beta$ terrace widths. However, because of the difficulty of experimentally identifying which step is $A$ or $B$, it has not been possible to determine the absolute difference in their behavior, e.g. which step has higher adatom attachment rate constants. Here we show that surface X-ray scattering can measure the fraction of $\alpha$ and $\beta$ terraces, and thus unambiguously differentiate the growth dynamics of $A$ and $B$ steps. We first present calculations of the intensity profiles of GaN crystal truncation rods (CTRs) that demonstrate a marked dependence on the $\alpha$ terrace fraction $f_{\alpha }$. We then present surface X-ray scattering measurements performed \textit{in situ} during homoepitaxial growth on (0001) GaN by vapor phase epitaxy. By analyzing the shapes of the $(10\bar{1}L)$ and $(01\bar{1}L)$ CTRs, we determine that the steady-state $f_{\alpha }$ increases at higher growth rate, indicating that attachment rate constants are higher at $A$ steps than at $B$ steps. We also observe the dynamics of $f_{\alpha }$ after growth conditions are changed. The results are analyzed using a Burton-Cabrera-Frank model for a surface with alternating step types, to extract values for the kinetic parameters of $A$ and $B$ steps. These are compared with predictions for GaN (0001).

18 pages, 30 figures, 12 tables, 3 appendices. This is long paper to accompany "Do A or B Steps Have Faster Kinetics during Hexagonal Crystal Growth?" by same author list