Is the Hubble diagram of quasars in tension with concordance cosmology?
arXiv:1911.11848 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevD.101.043502
Abstract
Recently Risaliti \& Lusso [Nature Astron. 3 (2019) 3 272] reported new measurements of the expansion rate of the Universe by constructing the Hubble diagram of 1598 quasars in the redshift range . It is claimed a tension with the standard concordance CDM concerning both the fractionary matter density and the dark energy equation of state parameter standard values. In this work we promote an independent analysis of the same data set using a model-independent estimator for cosmic acceleration. Our results corroborate that the source of such tension can be related to the value with a reasonable indication of a higher value (). On the other hand, we find that the role played by on the claimed tension is weak. We also discuss the use of this estimator as a "quality tool" to test the robustness of Hubble diagrams. We conclude claiming that the Quasars data can not yet be seen as a reliable cosmological tool since they can not even state the universe experienced an accelerated expansion phase.
5 pages, 2 figures
References in corpus (7)
- The Hubble Diagram to Redshift >6 from 69 Gamma-Ray Bursts
- Cosmology with gamma-ray bursts: I. The Hubble diagram through the calibrated - correlation
- A Cosmology-Independent Calibration of Gamma-Ray Burst Luminosity Relations and the Hubble Diagram
- Energy Conditions and Cosmic Acceleration
- Quasars as standard candles II: The non linear relation between UV and X-ray emission at high redshifts
- How strong is the evidence for accelerated expansion?
- Direct evidence of acceleration from distance modulus redshift graph
Cited by in corpus (24)
- Challenges for CDM: An update
- Cosmology with the Laser Interferometer Space Antenna
- Seven hints that early-time new physics alone is not sufficient to solve the Hubble tension
- Revealing Intrinsic Flat CDM Biases with Standardizable Candles
- Using quasar X-ray and UV flux measurements to constrain cosmological model parameters
- On Larger Values in the CMB Dipole Direction
- Determining the range of validity of quasar X-ray and UV flux measurements for constraining cosmological model parameters
- Testing the Quasar Hubble Diagram with LISA Standard Sirens
- Tracing dark energy history with gamma ray bursts
- Hints of dark energy anisotropic stress using Machine Learning
- Gravitational-Wave Detector Networks: Standard Sirens on Cosmology and Modified Gravity Theory
- Cosmology Intertwined: A Review of the Particle Physics, Astrophysics, and Cosmology Associated with the Cosmological Tensions and Anomalies
- Testing cosmic anisotropy with Pantheon sample and quasars at high redshifts
- The distribution of galaxy rotation in JWST Advanced Deep Extragalactic Survey
- Does CDM really be in tension with the Hubble diagram data?
- Testing the cosmic opacity at higher redshifts: implication from quasars with available UV and X-ray observations
- Redshift Evolution and Non-Universal Dispersion of Quasar Luminosity Correlation
- Model-Independent Determination of and using Time-Delay Galaxy Lenses and Gamma-Ray Bursts
- Constraints on Cosmological Models from Quasars Calibrated with Type Ia Supernova by a Gaussian Process
- Do stellar-mass and super-massive black holes have similar dining habits?
- New evidence and analysis of cosmological-scale asymmetry in galaxy spin directions
- Probing alternative cosmologies through the inverse distance ladder
- Large-scale asymmetry in galaxy spin directions -- analysis of galaxies with spectra in DES, SDSS, and DESI Legacy Survey
- Galaxy spin direction asymmetry in JWST deep fields