A new measure of tension between experiments

Abstract

Tensions between cosmological measurements by different surveys or probes have always been important --- and are presently much discussed --- as they may lead to evidence of new physics. Several tests have been devised to probe the consistency of datasets given a cosmological model, but they often have undesired features such as dependence on the prior volume, or burdensome requirements such as that of near-Gaussian posterior distributions. We propose a new quantity, defined in a similar way as the Bayesian evidence ratio, in which these undesired properties are absent. We test the quantity on simple models with Gaussian and non-Gaussian likelihoods. We then apply it to data from the Planck satellite: we investigate the consistency of $\Lambda$CDM model parameters obtained from TT and EE angular power spectrum measurements, as well as the mutual consistency of cosmological parameters obtained from large scale (multipoles, $\ell <1000$) and small scale ($\ell \ge 1000$) portions of each measurement and find no significant discrepancy in the six-dimensional $\Lambda$CDM parameter space.

arXiv comment5 pages, 2 figures; v2: modification to the significance evaluation of the measure

References in corpus (32)

• Planck 2015 results. XIII. Cosmological parameters
• Efficient Computation of CMB anisotropies in closed FRW models
• MultiNest: an efficient and robust Bayesian inference tool for cosmology and particle physics
• A 2.4% Determination of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant
• Multimodal nested sampling: an efficient and robust alternative to MCMC methods for astronomical data analysis
• Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Galaxy Clustering and Weak Lensing
• KiDS-450: Cosmological parameter constraints from tomographic weak gravitational lensing
• The trouble with $H_0$
• Planck 2015 results. XI. CMB power spectra, likelihoods, and robustness of parameters
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Cosmological Constraints from Cosmic Shear
• CMB power spectrum parameter degeneracies in the era of precision cosmology
• CFHTLenS revisited: assessing concordance with Planck including astrophysical systematics
• Prospects for resolving the Hubble constant tension with standard sirens
• Planck intermediate results. LI. Features in the cosmic microwave background temperature power spectrum and shifts in cosmological parameters
• Combining cosmological datasets: hyperparameters and Bayesian evidence
• Bayesian evidence as a tool for comparing datasets
• Survey geometry and the internal consistency of recent cosmic shear measurements
• Cosmological discordances II: Hubble constant, Planck and large-scale-structure data sets
• Is there concordance within the concordance $\Lambda$CDM model?
• Cosmological discordances: a new measure, marginalization effects, and application to geometry vs growth current data sets
• A Comparison of Cosmological Parameters Determined from CMB Temperature Power Spectra from the South Pole Telescope and the Planck Satellite
• Compatibility of Planck and BICEP2 in the Light of Inflation
• Information Gains from Cosmic Microwave Background Experiments
• Planck confronts large scale structure: methods to quantify discordance
• Quantifying Tensions between CMB and Distance Datasets in Models with Free Curvature or Lensing Amplitude
• Consistency tests in cosmology using relative entropy
• Internal Robustness: systematic search for systematic bias in SN Ia data
• Robustness to systematics for future dark energy probes
• Quantifying Concordance in Cosmology
• Conservative cosmology: combining data with allowance for unknown systematics
• Consistency of the Planck CMB data and $\Lambda$CDM cosmology

Cited by in corpus (22)

• Planck evidence for a closed Universe and a possible crisis for cosmology
• New physics in light of the $H_0$ tension: an alternative view
• Curvature tension: evidence for a closed universe
• Eppur è piatto? The cosmic chronometer take on spatial curvature and cosmic concordance
• Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and the Hubble Constant: Past, Present and Future
• Arbitrating the $S_8$ discrepancy with growth rate measurements from Redshift-Space Distortions
• The galaxy power spectrum take on spatial curvature and cosmic concordance
• Quantifying tensions in cosmological parameters: Interpreting the DES evidence ratio
• Assessing tension metrics with Dark Energy Survey and Planck data
• Non-Gaussian estimates of tensions in cosmological parameters
• Quantifying concordance of correlated cosmological data sets
• Dark Energy Survey Year 1 Results: Constraining Baryonic Physics in the Universe
• Consistency tests in cosmology using relative entropy
• Testing Gravity on Cosmic Scales: A Case Study of Jordan-Brans-Dicke Theory
• A Bayesian interpretation of inconsistency measures in cosmology
• Quantifying Suspiciousness Within Correlated Data Sets
• CosmoBit: A GAMBIT module for computing cosmological observables and likelihoods
• A Bayesian quantification of consistency in correlated datasets
• Cosmological discordances III: more on measure properties, Large-Scale-Structure constraints, the Hubble constant and Planck
• When tension is just a fluctuation: How noisy data affect model comparison
• Turnaround density as a probe of the cosmological constant
• Searching for a signature of turnaround in galaxy clusters with convolutional neural networks