Internal Robustness: systematic search for systematic bias in SN Ia data
arXiv:1209.1897 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stt008
Abstract
A great deal of effort is currently being devoted to understanding, estimating and removing systematic errors in cosmological data. In the particular case of type Ia supernovae, systematics are starting to dominate the error budget. Here we propose a Bayesian tool for carrying out a systematic search for systematic contamination. This serves as an extension to the standard goodness-of-fit tests and allows not only to cross-check raw or processed data for the presence of systematics but also to pin-point the data that are most likely contaminated. We successfully test our tool with mock catalogues and conclude that the Union2.1 data do not possess a significant amount of systematics. Finally, we show that if one includes in Union2.1 the supernovae that originally failed the quality cuts, our tool signals the presence of systematics at over 3.8-sigma confidence level.
14 pages, 15 figures; matches version accepted for publication in MNRAS
References in corpus (29)
- Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
- Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae
- Seven-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation
- Detection of the Baryon Acoustic Peak in the Large-Scale Correlation Function of SDSS Luminous Red Galaxies
- The Supernova Legacy Survey: Measurement of Omega_M, Omega_Lambda and w from the First Year Data Set
- The Hubble Space Telescope Cluster Supernova Survey: V. Improving the Dark Energy Constraints Above z>1 and Building an Early-Type-Hosted Supernova Sample
- Improved Cosmological Constraints from New, Old and Combined Supernova Datasets
- Bayes in the sky: Bayesian inference and model selection in cosmology
- Improved Dark Energy Constraints from ~100 New CfA Supernova Type Ia Light Curves
- Supernova Constraints and Systematic Uncertainties from the First 3 Years of the Supernova Legacy Survey
- SALT2: using distant supernovae to improve the use of Type Ia supernovae as distance indicators
- Improved Distances to Type Ia Supernovae with Multicolor Light Curve Shapes: MLCS2k2
- The Supernova Legacy Survey 3-year sample: Type Ia Supernovae photometric distances and cosmological constraints
- Distances, ages, and epoch of formation of globular clusters
- The White Dwarf Cooling Sequence of the Globular Cluster Messier 4
- The WiggleZ Dark Energy Survey: testing the cosmological model with baryon acoustic oscillations at z=0.6
- Confronting Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi models with Observational Cosmology
- Type Ia Supernovae as Stellar Endpoints and Cosmological Tools
- Probing the anisotropic local universe and beyond with SNe Ia data
- Searching for a Cosmological Preferred Axis: Union2 Data Analysis and Comparison with Other Probes
- Ruling out four-neutrino oscillation interpretations of the LSND anomaly?
- First-year Sloan Digital Sky Survey-II (SDSS-II) supernova results: consistency and constraints with other intermediate-redshift datasets
- A More General Model for the Intrinsic Scatter in Type Ia Supernova Distance Moduli
- Observational constraints on inhomogeneous cosmological models without dark energy
- Ages of globular clusters: a new approach
- Large-scale inhomogeneities may improve the cosmic concordance of supernovae
- Robustness to systematics for future dark energy probes
- Fisher Matrix Preloaded -- Fisher4Cast
- Type Ia supernova parameter estimation: a comparison of two approaches using current datasets
Cited by in corpus (33)
- Cosmology and Fundamental Physics with the Euclid Satellite
- Cosmology and fundamental physics with the Euclid satellite
- Concordance and Discordance in Cosmology
- Internal Robustness of Growth Rate data
- Assessing tension metrics with Dark Energy Survey and Planck data
- Cosmological discordances II: Hubble constant, Planck and large-scale-structure data sets
- Is there concordance within the concordance CDM model?
- Breaking the spell of Gaussianity: forecasting with higher order Fisher matrices
- Cosmological discordances: a new measure, marginalization effects, and application to geometry vs growth current data sets
- Non-Gaussian estimates of tensions in cosmological parameters
- Quantifying concordance of correlated cosmological data sets
- Designing Horndeski and the effective fluid approach
- Hints for a gravitational constant transition in Tully-Fisher data
- Accurate weak lensing of standard candles. I. Flexible cosmological fits
- Quantifying Tensions between CMB and Distance Datasets in Models with Free Curvature or Lensing Amplitude
- Consistency tests in cosmology using relative entropy
- Accurate Weak Lensing of Standard Candles. II. Measuring sigma8 with Supernovae
- Anisotropic expansion and SNIa: an open issue
- Quantifying Concordance in Cosmology
- Quantifying the tension between cosmological and terrestrial constraints on neutrino masses
- First measurement of using supernova magnitudes only
- A new measure of tension between experiments
- Extensive search for bias in SNIa data
- Cosmological constraints on non-adiabatic dark energy perturbations
- Hints for possible low redshift oscillation around the best fit CDM model in the expansion history of the Universe
- On the amount of peculiar velocity field information in supernovae from LSST and beyond
- Cosmological constraints with the Effective Fluid approach for Modified Gravity
- Consistent use of Type Ia supernovae highly magnified by galaxy clusters to constrain the cosmological parameters
- Cosmic dipole tensions: confronting the cosmic microwave background with infrared and radio populations of cosmological sources
- One Extension to Explain Them All, One Scale-Invariant Spectrum to Test Them All, and in One Model Bind Them
- Non-Linearity-Free prediction of the growth-rate using Convolutional Neural Networks
- A test for the redshift dependence of using measurements
- Searching for bias and correlations in a Bayesian way