The Evolution of Bulge-Dominated Field Galaxies from z~1 to the Present

Abstract

We analyze the stellar populations and evolutionary history of bulge-dominated field galaxies at redshifts 0.3<z<1.2 as part of the Gemini/HST Galaxy Cluster Project (GCP). High signal-to-noise optical spectroscopy from the Gemini Observatory and imaging from the Hubble Space Telescope are used to analyze a total of 43 galaxies, focusing on the 30 passive galaxies in the sample. Using the size-mass and velocity dispersion-mass relations for the passive field galaxies we find no significant evolution of sizes or velocity dispersions at a given dynamical mass between z~1 and the present. We establish the Fundamental Plane and study mass-to-light (M/L) ratios. The M/L vs. dynamical mass relation shows that the passive field galaxies follow a relation with a steeper slope than the local comparison sample, consistent with cluster galaxies in the GCP at z=0.86. This steeper slope indicates that the formation redshift is mass dependent, in agreement with "downsizing," meaning that the low mass galaxies formed their stars more recently while the high mass galaxies formed their stars at higher redshift. The zero point differences of the scaling relations for the M/L ratios imply a formation redshift of z_form=1.35(+0.10)(-0.07) for the passive field galaxies. This is consistent with the (Hdelta_A + Hgamma_A)' line index which implies a formation redshift of z_form=1.40(+0.60)(-0.18).

arXiv commentAccepted for publication in The Astrophysical Journal 08/20/2017

References in corpus (52)

• Detailed Structural Decomposition of Galaxy Images
• Evolutionary population synthesis: models, analysis of the ingredients and application to high-z galaxies
• The epochs of early-type galaxy formation as a function of environment
• New Insight on Galaxy Formation and Evolution from Keck Spectroscopy of the Hawaii Deep Fields
• The Cosmic Baryon Budget
• The Growth of Massive Galaxies Since z=2
• Estimating Fixed Frame Galaxy Magnitudes in the SDSS
• The Fundamental Plane for cluster E and S0 galaxies
• Strong size evolution of the most massive galaxies since z~2
• Can Minor Merging Account for the Size Growth of Quiescent Galaxies? New Results from the CANDELS Survey
• The Morphology - Density Relation in z ~ 1 Clusters
• Stellar population models at high spectral resolution
• Environment and self-regulation in galaxy formation
• The Assembly History of Field Spheroidals: Evolution of Mass-to-light Ratios and Signatures of Recent Star Formation
• Keck Spectroscopy of distant GOODS Spheroidal Galaxies: Downsizing in a Hierarchical Universe
• E and S0 galaxies in the central part of the Coma cluster: Ages, metal abundances and dark matter
• Stellar populations of early-type galaxies in different environments II. Ages and metallicities
• Flux-calibrated stellar population models of Lick absorption-line indices with variable element abundance ratios
• The VLT LEGA-C Spectroscopic Survey: The Physics of Galaxies at a Lookback Time of 7 Gyr
• Mass-to-Light Ratios of Field Early-Type Galaxies at z~1 from Ultra-Deep Spectroscopy: Evidence for Mass-dependent Evolution
• Evolution and environment of early-type galaxies
• Charting the evolution of the ages and metallicities of massive galaxies since z=0.7
• The Assembly Histories of Quiescent Galaxies Since z=0.7 from Absorption Line Spectroscopy
• The Star Formation Epoch of the Most Massive Early-Type Galaxies
• Velocity Dispersions and Dynamical Masses for a Large Sample of Quiescent Galaxies at z > 1: Improved Measures of the Growth in Mass and Size
• Stellar populations of early-type galaxies in different environments I. Line-strength indices
• The DEEP Groth Strip Survey IX: Evolution of the Fundamental Plane of Field Galaxies
• The evolution of early-type galaxies at z~1 from the K20 survey
• Observing the Formation of the Hubble Sequence in the Great Observatories Origins Deep Survey
• The fundamental plane of EDisCS galaxies - The effect of size evolution
• The properties of field elliptical galaxies at intermediate redshift. III: the Fundamental Plane and the evolution of stellar populations from z~0.4 to z=0
• How was the Hubble sequence 6 Gyrs ago?
• The Evolution of the Field and Cluster Morphology-Density Relation for Mass-Selected Samples of Galaxies
• Stellar populations of early-type galaxies in different environments III. Line-strength gradients
• Mass-Selection and the Evolution of the Morphology-Density Relation from z=0.8 to z=0
• The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Mean Ages and Metallicities of Red Field Galaxies at z ~ 0.9 from Stacked Keck/DEIMOS Spectra
• A VLT spectroscopic survey of RX J0152.7-1357, a forming cluster of galaxies at z=0.837
• No evidence for a dependence of the mass size relation of early-type galaxies on environment in the local Universe
• Stellar populations and evolution of early-type cluster galaxies: Constraints from optical imaging and spectroscopy of z=0.5-0.9 galaxy clusters
• The Fundamental Plane for z=0.8-0.9 cluster galaxies
• RXJ0152.7-1357: Stellar populations in an X-ray luminous galaxy cluster at z=0.83
• Internal dynamics of the z sim 0.8 cluster RX J0152.7-1357
• Early-Type galaxies at z ~ 1.3. III. On the dependence of Formation Epochs and Star Formation Histories on Stellar Mass and Environment
• Cluster and field elliptical galaxies at z~1.3. The marginal role of the environment and the relevance of the galaxy central regions
• Star Formation Histories in a Cluster Environment at z~0.84
• Kinematic and chemical evolution of early-type galaxies
• RXJ0848.6+4453: The Evolution of Galaxy Sizes and Stellar Populations in a z=1.27 Cluster
• The stellar populations of early-type galaxies -- II. The effects of environment and mass
• Star-forming fractions and galaxy evolution with redshift in rich X-ray-selected galaxy clusters
• The Gemini/HST Cluster Project: Structural and Photometric Properties of Galaxies in Three z =0.28-0.89 Clusters
• The Influence of Mass and Environment on the Evolution of Early-Type Galaxies
• The most massive galaxies in clusters are already fully grown at $z\sim 0.5$

Cited by in corpus (5)

• The GOGREEN survey: Post-infall environmental quenching fails to predict the observed age difference between quiescent field and cluster galaxies at z>1
• Age, metallicity and star formation history of spheroidal galaxies in cluster at z~1.2
• Synthesizing Stellar Populations in South Pole Telescope Galaxy Clusters: I. Ages of Quiescent Member Galaxies at 0.3 < z < 1.4
• The Fundamental Plane of cluster spheroidal galaxies at z$\sim 1.3$. Evidence for mass-dependent evolution
• The Gemini/HST galaxy cluster project: Redshift 0.2-1.0 cluster sample, X-ray data and optical photometry catalog