Magnetic Field Configuration Models and Reconstruction Methods for Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections
arXiv:1209.6394 · doi:10.1007/s11207-013-0244-5
Abstract
This study aims to provide a reference to different magnetic field models and reconstruction methods for interplanetary coronal mass ejections (ICMEs). In order to understand the differences in the outputs of those models and codes, we analyze 59 events from the Coordinated Data Analysis Workshop (CDAW) list, using four different magnetic field models and reconstruction techniques; force-free fitting (Goldstein,1983,Burlaga,1988,Lepping et al.,1990), magnetostatic reconstruction using a numerical solution to the Grad-Shafranov equation (Hu and Sonnerup, 2001), fitting to a self-similarly expanding cylindrical configuration (Marubashi and Lepping, 2007) and elliptical, non-force free fitting (Hidalgo,2003). The resulting parameters of the reconstructions for the 59 events are compared statistically, as well as in selected case studies. The ability of a method to fit or reconstruct an event is found to vary greatly: the Grad-Shafranov reconstruction is successful for most magnetic clouds (MCs) but for less than 10% of the non-MC ICMEs; the other three methods provide a successful fit for more than 65% of all events. The differences between the reconstruction and fitting methods are discussed, and suggestions are proposed as to how to reduce them. We find that the magnitude of the axial field is relatively consistent across models but not the orientation of the axis of the ejecta. We also find that there are a few cases for which different signs of the magnetic helicity are found for the same event when we do not fix the boundaries, illustrating that this simplest of parameters is not necessarily always well constrained by fitting and reconstruction models. Finally, we look at three unique cases in depth to provide a comprehensive idea of the different aspects of how the fitting and reconstruction codes work.
23 pages, 6 pages, pre-acceptance in Solar Physics topical Issue on flux rope structures of CMEs
References in corpus (4)
- Three-Dimensional MHD Simulation of the 2003 October 28 Coronal Mass Ejection: Comparison with LASCO Coronagraph Observations
- Progressive transformation of a flux rope to an ICME
- Solar-Terrestrial Simulation in the STEREO Era: The January 24-25, 2007 Eruptions
- Grad-Shafranov reconstruction of magnetic clouds: overview and improvements
Cited by in corpus (38)
- Connecting speeds, directions and arrival times of 22 coronal mass ejections from the Sun to 1 AU
- Predicting the magnetic vectors within coronal mass ejections arriving at Earth: 1. Initial Architecture
- Generic magnetic field intensity profiles of interplanetary coronal mass ejections at Mercury, Venus and Earth from superposed epoch analyses
- A STEREO Survey of Magnetic Cloud Coronal Mass Ejections Observed at Earth in 2008--2012
- Coronal Magnetic Structure of Earthbound CMEs and In situ Comparison
- Investigating plasma motion of magnetic clouds at 1 AU through a velocity-modified cylindrical force-free flux rope model
- A New Class of Complex Ejecta Resulting from the Interaction of two CMEs and its Expected Geoeffectiveness
- On the Mesoscale Structure of CMEs at Mercury's Orbit: BepiColombo and Parker Solar Probe Observations
- Inconsistencies Between Local and Global Measures of CME Radial Expansion as Revealed by Spacecraft Conjunctions
- In Situ Properties of Small and Large Flux Ropes in the Solar Wind
- CME Magnetic Structure and IMF Preconditioning Affecting SEP Transport
- Importance of CME Radial Expansion on the Ability of Slow CMEs to Drive Shocks
- Magnetic Flux and Helicity of Magnetic Clouds
- On the Radial and Longitudinal Variation of a Magnetic Cloud: ACE, Wind, ARTEMIS and Juno Observations
- Causes and Consequences of Magnetic Complexity Changes within Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections: a Statistical Study
- Rotation and interaction of the September 8 and 10, 2014 CMEs tested with EUHFORIA
- Exploring the radial evolution of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections using EUHFORIA
- Evolution of interplanetary coronal mass ejection complexity: a numerical study through a swarm of simulated spacecraft
- Fitting and Reconstruction of Thirteen Simple Coronal Mass Ejections
- Multi-Spacecraft Observations of the Evolution of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Between 0.3 and 2.2 AU: Conjunctions with the Juno Spacecraft
- A Helicity-Based Method to Infer the CME Magnetic Field Magnitude in Sun and Geospace: Generalization and Extension to Sun-Like and M-Dwarf Stars and Implications for Exoplanet Habitability
- Cross helicity of interplanetary coronal mass ejections at 1 au
- Characteristic Scales of Complexity and Coherence within Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections: Insights from Spacecraft Swarms in Global Heliospheric Simulations
- Comparison of magnetic properties in a magnetic cloud and its solar source on April 11-14 2013
- On the utility of flux rope models for CME magnetic structure below 30
- Solar energetic particles injected inside and outside a magnetic cloud: The widespread solar energetic particle event on 2022 January 20
- Evolution of the Radial Size and Expansion of Coronal Mass Ejections Investigated by Combining Remote and In-Situ Observations
- Distorted-Toroidal Flux Rope model for Heliospheric Flux Ropes
- A coronal mass ejection encountered by four spacecraft within 1 au from the Sun: Ensemble modelling of propagation and magnetic structure
- Topical Issue in Solar Physics: Flux-rope Structure of Coronal Mass Ejections Preface
- Exploring the biases of a new method based on minimum variance for interplanetary magnetic clouds
- Inferences About the Magnetic Field Structure of a CME with Both In Situ and Faraday Rotation Constraints
- Determination of CME orientation and consequences for their propagation
- Re-analysis of Lepping's Fitting Method for Magnetic Clouds: Lundquist Fit Reloaded
- The Magnetic Field Geometry of Small Solar Wind Flux Ropes Inferred from their Twist Distribution
- Space weather: the solar perspective -- an update to Schwenn (2006)
- Earth-affecting Solar Transients: A Review of Progresses in Solar Cycle 24
- Predicting the Magnetic Fields of a Stealth CME Detected by Parker Solar Probe at 0.5 AU