Fitting and Reconstruction of Thirteen Simple Coronal Mass Ejections

Abstract

Coronal mass ejections (CMEs) are the main drivers of geomagnetic disturbances, but the effects of their interaction with Earth's magnetic field depend on their magnetic configuration and orientation. Fitting and reconstruction techniques have been developed to determine the important geometrical and physical CME properties. In many instances, there is disagreement between such different methods but also between fitting from in situ measurements and reconstruction based on remote imaging. Here, we compare three methods based on different assumptions for measurements of thirteen CMEs by the Wind spacecraft from 1997 to 2015. These CMEs are selected from the interplanetary coronal mass ejections catalog on https://wind.nasa.gov/ICMEindex.php due to their simplicity in terms of 1) small expansion speed throughout the CME and 2) little asymmetry in the magnetic field profile. This makes these thirteen events ideal candidates to compare codes that do not include expansion nor distortion. We find that, for these simple events, the codes are in relatively good agreement in terms of the CME axis orientation for six out of the 13 events. Using the Grad-Shafranov technique, we can determine the shape of the cross-section, which is assumed to be circular for the other two models, a force-free fitting and a circular-cylindrical non-force-free fitting. Five of the events are found to have a clear circular cross-section, even when this is not a pre-condition of the reconstruction. We make an initial attempt at evaluating the adequacy of the different assumptions for these simple CMEs. The conclusion of this work strongly suggests that attempts at reconciling in situ and remote-sensing views of CMEs must take in consideration the compatibility of the different models with specific CME structures to better reproduce flux ropes.

arXiv comment12 pages, accepted to Solar Physics

References in corpus (8)

• Three-Dimensional MHD Simulation of the 2003 October 28 Coronal Mass Ejection: Comparison with LASCO Coronagraph Observations
• History and Development of Coronal Mass Ejections as a Key Player in Solar Terrestrial Relationship
• Magnetohydrodynamic Modeling of the Solar Eruption on 2010 April 8
• Numerical Investigation of a Coronal Mass Ejection from an Anemone Active Region: Reconnection and Deflection of the 2005 August 22 Eruption
• Global and local expansion of magnetic clouds in the inner heliosphere
• Magnetic Field Configuration Models and Reconstruction Methods for Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections
• Inner Heliospheric Evolution of a "Stealth" CME Derived From Multi-view Imaging and Multipoint In--situ observations: I. Propagation to 1 AU
• Grad-Shafranov reconstruction of magnetic clouds: overview and improvements

Cited by in corpus (11)

• Heliospheric Evolution of Magnetic Clouds
• On the Mesoscale Structure of CMEs at Mercury's Orbit: BepiColombo and Parker Solar Probe Observations
• On the Radial and Longitudinal Variation of a Magnetic Cloud: ACE, Wind, ARTEMIS and Juno Observations
• Causes and Consequences of Magnetic Complexity Changes within Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections: a Statistical Study
• Multi-Spacecraft Observations of the Evolution of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Between 0.3 and 2.2 AU: Conjunctions with the Juno Spacecraft
• Characteristic Scales of Complexity and Coherence within Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections: Insights from Spacecraft Swarms in Global Heliospheric Simulations
• On the utility of flux rope models for CME magnetic structure below 30$R_{\odot }$
• Evolution of CME Properties in the Inner Heliosphere: Prediction for Solar Orbiter and Parker Solar Probe
• A coronal mass ejection encountered by four spacecraft within 1 au from the Sun: Ensemble modelling of propagation and magnetic structure
• The Magnetic Field Geometry of Small Solar Wind Flux Ropes Inferred from their Twist Distribution
• Predicting the Magnetic Fields of a Stealth CME Detected by Parker Solar Probe at 0.5 AU