On the utility of flux rope models for CME magnetic structure below 30$R_{\odot }$

Abstract

We present a comprehensive analysis of the three-dimensional magnetic flux rope structure generated during the Lynch et al. (2019) magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) simulation of a global-scale, 360 degree-wide streamer blowout coronal mass ejection (CME) eruption. We create both fixed and moving synthetic spacecraft to generate time series of the MHD variables through different regions of the flux rope CME. Our moving spacecraft trajectories are derived from the spatial coordinates of Parker Solar Probe's past encounters 7 and 9 and future encounter 23. Each synthetic time series through the simulation flux rope ejecta is fit with three different in-situ flux rope models commonly used to characterize the large-scale, coherent magnetic field rotations observed in a significant fraction of interplanetary CMEs (ICMEs). We present each of the in-situ flux rope model fits to the simulation data and discuss the similarities and differences between the model fits and the MHD simulation's flux rope spatial orientations, field strengths and rotations, expansion profiles, and magnetic flux content. We compare in-situ model properties to those calculated with the MHD data for both classic bipolar and unipolar ICME flux rope configurations as well as more problematic profiles such as those with a significant radial component to the flux rope axis orientation or profiles obtained with large impact parameters. We find general agreement among the in-situ flux rope fitting results for the classic profiles and much more variation among results for the problematic profiles. We also examine the force-free assumption for a subset of the flux rope models and quantify properties of the Lorentz force within MHD ejecta intervals. We conclude that the in-situ flux rope models are generally a decent approximation to the field structure, but all the caveats associated with in-situ flux rope models will still apply...

25 pages, 13 figures, 3 tables. Accepted for publication in Adv. Space Res

References in corpus (19)

• Structures of Interplanetary Magnetic Flux Ropes and Comparison with Their Solar Sources
• Determining the Intrinsic CME Flux Rope Type Using Remote-sensing Solar Disk Observations
• A model for stealth coronal mass ejections
• Prediction of the in situ coronal mass ejection rate for solar cycle 25: Implications for Parker Solar Probe in situ observations
• Multipoint interplanetary coronal mass ejections observed with Solar Orbiter, BepiColombo, Parker Solar Probe, Wind and STEREO-A
• Self-similar expansion of solar coronal mass ejections: implications for Lorentz self-force driving
• WISPR Imaging of a Pristine CME
• In Situ Properties of Small and Large Flux Ropes in the Solar Wind
• First simultaneous in situ measurements of a coronal mass ejection by Parker Solar Probe and STEREO-A
• The Role of Magnetic Helicity in Structuring the Solar Corona
• A Catalog of Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections Observed by Juno between 1 and 5.4 AU
• Causes and Consequences of Magnetic Complexity Changes within Interplanetary Coronal Mass Ejections: a Statistical Study
• Modeling a Coronal Mass Ejection from an Extended Filament Channel. I. Eruption and Early Evolution
• Uncovering Erosion Effects on Magnetic Flux Rope Twist
• Morphological Reconstruction of a Small Transient Observed by Parker Solar Probe on 2018 November 5
• Evolution of a Streamer-Blowout CME as Observed by Imagers on Parker Solar Probe and the Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory
• Contribution of the aging effect to the observed asymmetry of interplanetary magnetic clouds
• Evolution of CME Properties in the Inner Heliosphere: Prediction for Solar Orbiter and Parker Solar Probe
• Predicting the Magnetic Fields of a Stealth CME Detected by Parker Solar Probe at 0.5 AU

Cited by in corpus (6)

• On the Mesoscale Structure of CMEs at Mercury's Orbit: BepiColombo and Parker Solar Probe Observations
• Solar energetic particles injected inside and outside a magnetic cloud: The widespread solar energetic particle event on 2022 January 20
• Writhed Analytical Magnetic Flux Rope Model
• Synthetic Remote-sensing and In-situ Observations of Fine-scale Structure in a Pseudostreamer Coronal Mass Ejection through the Solar Corona
• Modeling CME encounters at Parker Solar Probe with OSPREI: Dependence on photospheric and coronal conditions
• Assessment of the near-Sun magnetic field of the 10 March 2022 coronal mass ejection observed by Solar Orbiter