Rotation and interaction of the September 8 and 10, 2014 CMEs tested with EUHFORIA
arXiv:2305.06881 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202345902
Abstract
Solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) can catch up and interact with preceding CMEs and solar wind structures to undergo rotation and deflection during their propagation. We aim to show how interactions undergone by a CME in the corona and heliosphere can play a significant role in altering its geoeffectiveness predicted at the time of its eruption. We consider a case study of two successive CMEs launched from the active region NOAA 12158 in early September 2014. The second CME was predicted to be extensively geoeffective based on the remote-sensing observations of the source region. However, in situ measurements at 1~au recorded only a short-lasting weak negative Bz component followed by a prolonged positive Bz component. The EUropean Heliosphere FORecasting Information Asset (EUHFORIA) is used to perform a self-consistent 3D MHD simulation of the two CMEs in the heliosphere. The initial conditions of the CMEs are determined by combining observational insights near the Sun, fine-tuned to match the in situ observations near 1~au, and additional numerical experiments of each individual CME. By introducing CME1 before CME2 in the EUHFORIA simulation, we modelled the negative Bz component in the sheath region ahead of CME2 whose formation can be attributed to the interaction between CME1 and CME2. To reproduce the positive Bz component in the magnetic ejecta of CME2, we had to initialise CME2 with an orientation determined at 0.1~au and consistent with the orientation interpreted at 1~au, instead of the orientation observed during its eruption. EUHFORIA simulations suggest the possibility of a significant rotation of CME2 in the low corona in order to explain the in situ observations at 1~au. Coherent magnetic field rotations, potentially geoeffective, can be formed in the sheath region as a result of CME-CME interactions in the heliosphere even if the individual CMEs are not geoeffective.
The paper is accepted in A&A journal for publication on May 5, 2023
References in corpus (10)
- CME-CME Interactions as Sources of CME Geo-effectiveness: The Formation of the Complex Ejecta and Intense Geomagnetic Storm in Early September 2017
- FRiED: A novel three-dimensional model of coronal mass ejections
- Observation-based modelling of magnetised Coronal Mass Ejections with EUHFORIA
- Determining the Intrinsic CME Flux Rope Type Using Remote-sensing Solar Disk Observations
- Imaging and Spectroscopic Diagnostics on the Formation of Two Magnetic Flux Ropes Revealed by SDO/AIA and IRIS
- Sunspot Rotation as a Driver of Major Solar Eruptions in NOAA Active Region 12158
- Implementation and validation of the FRi3D flux rope model in EUHFORIA
- Successive interacting coronal mass ejections: How to create a perfect storm?
- The spheromak tilting and how it affects modelling coronal mass ejections
- Comparison of magnetic properties in a magnetic cloud and its solar source on April 11-14 2013
Cited by in corpus (5)
- On the Mesoscale Structure of CMEs at Mercury's Orbit: BepiColombo and Parker Solar Probe Observations
- Collection, Collation, and Comparison of 3D Coronal CME Reconstructions
- Modeling a Coronal Mass Ejection from an Extended Filament Channel. II. Interplanetary Propagation to 1 au
- Toroidal modified Miller-Turner CME model in EUHFORIA: II. Validation and comparison with flux rope and spheromak
- Multi spacecraft study with the Icarus model: Modelling the propagation of CMEs to Mercury and Earth