Comparison of the VIMOS-VLT Deep Survey with the Munich semi-analytical model. II. The colour-density relation up to z=1.5

Abstract

[Abridged] We perform on galaxy mock catalogues the same colour-density analysis made by Cucciati et al. (2006) on a 5 Mpc/h scale using the VVDS-Deep survey, and compare the results from mocks with observed data. We use mocks with the same flux limits (I=24) as the VVDS (CMOCKS), built using the semi- analytic model by De Lucia & Blaizot (2007) applied to the Millennium Simulation. From CMOCKS, we extracted samples of galaxies mimicking the VVDS observational strategy (OMOCKS). We computed the B-band Luminosity Function LF and the colour-density relation (CDR) in the mocks. We find that the LF in mocks roughly agrees with the observed LF, but at z<0.8 the faint-end slope of the model LF is steeper than the VVDS one. Computing the LF for early and late type galaxies, we show that mocks have an excess of faint early-type and of bright late-type galaxies with respect to data. We find that the CDR in OMOCKS is in excellent agreement with the one in CMOCKS. At z~0.7, the CDR in mocks agrees with the VVDS one (red galaxies reside mainly in high densities). Yet, the strength of the CDR in mocks does not vary within 0.2<z<1.5, while the observed relation flattens with increasing z and possibly inverts at z=1.3. We argue that the lack of evolution in the CDR in mocks is not due only to inaccurate prescriptions for satellite galaxies, but that also the treatment of central galaxies has to be revised. The reversal of the CDR can be explained by wet mergers between young galaxies, producing a starburst event. This should be seen on group scales. A residual of this is found in observations at z=1.5 on larger scales, but not in the mocks, suggesting that the treatment of physical processes affecting satellites and central galaxies in models should be revised.

15 pages, 12 figures, accepted for publication in A&A

References in corpus (14)

• The hierarchical formation of the brightest cluster galaxies
• The environmental history of group and cluster galaxies in a LambdaCDM Universe
• The high redshift galaxy population in hierarchical galaxy formation models
• The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Evolution of the Color-Density Relation at 0.4 < z < 1.35
• Properties of Galaxy Groups in the SDSS: II.- AGN Feedback and Star Formation Truncation
• The WIRCam Deep Survey I: Counts, colours and mass-functions derived from near-infrared imaging in the CFHTLS deep fields
• The VIMOS VLT Deep Survey: The build-up of the colour-density relation
• The Dependence of Galaxy Formation on Cosmological Parameters: Can we distinguish the WMAP1 and WMAP3 Parameter Sets?
• The zCOSMOS 20k Group Catalog
• The VIMOS-VLT Deep Survey. Color bimodality and the mix of galaxy populations up to z~2
• Modelling and interpreting the dependence of clustering on the spectral energy distributions of galaxies
• The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: The Voronoi-Delaunay Method catalog of galaxy groups
• Mock observations with the Millennium simulation: Cosmological downsizing and intermediate redshift observations
• The VIMOS VLT Deep Survey: The K-band follow-up in the 0226-04 field

Cited by in corpus (13)

• Mass assembly in quiescent and star-forming galaxies since z=4 from UltraVISTA
• The influence of the environmental history on quenching star formation in a $\Lambda$CDM universe
• The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS). Luminosity and stellar mass dependence of galaxy clustering at 0.5<z<1.1
• The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS). Environmental effects shaping the galaxy stellar mass function
• VIMOS Ultra-Deep Survey (VUDS): Witnessing the Assembly of a Massive Cluster at z~3.3
• CLASH-VLT: The stellar mass function and stellar mass density profile of the z=0.44 cluster of galaxies MACS J1206.2-0847
• Machine Learning and Cosmological Simulations I: Semi-Analytical Models
• Modeling the connection between ultraviolet and infrared galaxy populations across cosmic times
• The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS). Never mind the gaps: comparing techniques to restore homogeneous sky coverage
• The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS). Hierarchical scaling and biasing
• On the Reversal of SFR-Density Relation at z=1: Insights from Simulations
• What Regulates Galaxy Evolution? Open Questions in Our Understanding of Galaxy Formation and Evolution
• Measuring galaxy environment with the synergy of future photometric and spectroscopic surveys