Bias in the Estimation of Global Luminosity Functions
arXiv:astro-ph/0402202 · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07796.x
Abstract
We discuss a bias present in the calculation of the global luminosity function (LF) which occurs when analysing faint galaxy samples. This effect exists because of the different spectral energy distributions of galaxies, which are in turn quantified by the k-corrections. We demonstrate that this bias occurs because not all galaxy types are visible in the same absolute magnitude range at a given redshift and it mainly arises at high redshift since it is related to large k-corrections. We use realistic simulations with observed LFs to investigate the amplitude of the bias. We also compare our results to the global LFs derived from Hubble Deep Field-North and -South (HDF) surveys. We conclude that, as expected, there is no bias in the global LF measured in the absolute magnitude range where all galaxy types are observable. Beyond this range the faint-end slope of the global LF can be over/under-estimated depending on the adopted LF estimator. The effect is larger when the reference filter in which the global LF is measured, is far from the rest-frame filter in which galaxies are selected. The fact that LF estimators are differently affected by this bias implies that the bias is minimal when the different LF estimators give measurements consistent with one another at the faint-end. For instance, we show that the estimators are discrepant in the same way both in the simulated and HDF LFs. This suggests that the HDF LFs are affected by the presently studied bias. The best solution to avoid this bias is to derive the global LF in the reference filter closest to the rest-frame selection filter.
13 pages, 8 figures, 1 table, accepted for publication in MNRAS
Cited by in corpus (42)
- Mass assembly in quiescent and star-forming galaxies since z=4 from UltraVISTA
- Galaxy Stellar Mass Assembly between 0.2<z<2 from the S-COSMOS survey
- The stellar mass assembly of galaxies from z=0 to z=4. Analysis of a sample selected in the rest-frame near-infrared with Spitzer
- The Herschel PEP/HerMES Luminosity Function. I: Probing the Evolution of PACS selected Galaxies to z~4
- The GALEX-VVDS Measurement of the Evolution of the Far-Ultraviolet Luminosity Density and the Cosmic Star Formation Rate
- The SWIRE-VVDS-CFHTLS surveys: stellar mass assembly over the last 10 Gyears. Evidence for a major build up of the red sequence between z=2 and z=1
- The Star Formation Rate Density and Dust Attenuation Evolution over 12 Gyr with the VVDS Surveys
- The VIMOS-VLT Deep Survey: Evolution of the galaxy luminosity function up to z=2 in first epoch data
- The GALEX-VVDS Measurement of the Evolution of the 1500A Luminosity Function
- Tracking the impact of environment on the Galaxy Stellar Mass Function up to z~1 in the 10k zCOSMOS sample
- Post-starburst galaxies: more than just an interesting curiosity
- COSMOS2020: The Galaxy Stellar Mass Function: the assembly and star formation cessation of galaxies at
- The VIMOS VLT Deep Survey: The build-up of the colour-density relation
- Mid- and Far-infrared Luminosity Functions and Galaxy Evolution from Multiwavelength Spitzer Observations up to z~2.5
- Luminosity functions for galaxies and quasars in the Spitzer Wide-Area Infrared Extra-galactic (SWIRE) Legacy survey
- The VIMOS VLT Deep Survey - Evolution of the luminosity functions by galaxy type up to z=1.5 from first epoch data
- Stellar mass functions: methods, systematics and results for the local Universe
- The cosmic evolution of oxygen and nitrogen abundances in star-forming galaxies over the past 10 Gyrs
- The VIMOS-VLT Deep Survey. Color bimodality and the mix of galaxy populations up to z~2
- Cosmic evolution of the galaxy mass and luminosity functions by morphological type from multi-wavelength data in the CDF-South
- The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS). Environmental effects shaping the galaxy stellar mass function
- The zCOSMOS survey: the role of the environment in the evolution of the luminosity function of different galaxy types
- Galaxy And Mass Assembly (GAMA): The mechanisms for quiescent galaxy formation at
- The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS): A quiescent formation of massive red-sequence galaxies over the past 9 Gyr
- PEP: first Herschel probe of dusty galaxy evolution up to z~3
- Galaxy luminosity function per morphological type up to z=1.2
- Shedding Light on the Galaxy Luminosity Function
- The cosmic star formation rate evolution from z=5 to z=0 from the VIMOS VLT Deep Survey
- The VVDS-SWIRE-GALEX-CFHTLS surveys: Physical properties of galaxies at z below 1.2 from photometric data
- The velocity field of 2MRS Ks=11.75 galaxies: constraints on beta and bulk flow from the luminosity function
- The star formation rate history in the FORS Deep and GOODS South Fields
- The Galaxy Luminosity Function at z~1 in the HUDF: Probing the Dwarf Population
- Comparison of the VIMOS-VLT Deep Survey with the Munich semi-analytical model. II. The colour-density relation up to z=1.5
- The zCOSMOS Redshift Survey: evolution of the light in bulges and discs since z~0.8
- The VVDS-VLA Deep Field - IV: Radio-optical properties
- HSC-CLAUDS survey: The star formation rate functions since z ~ 2 and comparison with hydrodynamical simulations
- Cosmological model dependence of the galaxy luminosity function: far-infrared results in the Lemaitre-Tolman-Bondi model
- Effect of spectral index distribution on estimating the AGN radio luminosity function
- The 2.4 m Galaxy Luminosity Function as Measured Using WISE. I. Measurement Techniques
- The Evolution of the Luminosity Function for Luminous Compact Blue Galaxies to z=1
- The 2.4 m Galaxy Luminosity Function as Measured Using WISE. II. Sample Selection
- GPU-Accelerated Hierarchical Bayesian Inference with Application to Modeling Cosmic Populations: CUDAHM