Comparison of the VIMOS-VLT Deep Survey with the Munich semi-analytical model - I. Magnitude counts, redshift distribution, colour bimodality, and galaxy clustering
arXiv:1010.0360 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201015540
Abstract
This paper presents a detailed comparison between high-redshift observations from the VIMOS-VLT Deep Survey (VVDS) and predictions from the Munich semi-analytical model of galaxy formation. In particular, we focus this analysis on the magnitude, redshift, and colour distributions of galaxies, as well as their clustering properties. We constructed 100 quasi-independent mock catalogues, using the output of the semi-analytical model presented in De Lucia & Blaizot (2007).We then applied the same observational selection function of the VVDS-Deep survey, so as to carry out a fair comparison between models and observations. We find that the semi-analytical model reproduces well the magnitude counts in the optical bands. It tends, however, to overpredict the abundance of faint red galaxies, in particular in the i' and z' bands. Model galaxies exhibit a colour bimodality that is only in qualitative agreement with the data. In particular, we find that the model tends to overpredict the number of red galaxies at low redshift and of blue galaxies at all redshifts probed by VVDS-Deep observations, although a large fraction of the bluest observed galaxies is absent from the model. In addition, the model overpredicts by about 14 per cent the number of galaxies observed at 0.2<z<1 with I_AB<24. When comparing the galaxy clustering properties, we find that model galaxies are more strongly clustered than observed ones at all redshift from z=0.2 to z=2, with the difference being less significant above z~1. When splitting the samples into red and blue galaxies, we find that the observed clustering of blue galaxies is well reproduced by the model, while red model galaxies are much more clustered than observed ones, being principally responsible for the strong global clustering found in the model. [abridged]
15 pages, 14 figures, accepted for publication in A&A
References in corpus (16)
- Five-Year Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe (WMAP) Observations: Cosmological Interpretation
- The hierarchical formation of the brightest cluster galaxies
- zCOSMOS: A Large VLT/VIMOS redshift survey covering 0 < z < 3 in the COSMOS field
- Weak Gravitational Lensing with COSMOS: Galaxy Selection and Shape Measurements
- The high redshift galaxy population in hierarchical galaxy formation models
- The MORGANA model for the rise of galaxies and active nuclei
- The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Color and Luminosity Dependence of Galaxy Clustering at z~1
- The Correlation of Star Formation Quenching with Internal Galaxy Properties and Environment
- The Dependence of Galaxy Formation on Cosmological Parameters: Can we distinguish the WMAP1 and WMAP3 Parameter Sets?
- The VIMOS-VLT Deep Survey. Color bimodality and the mix of galaxy populations up to z~2
- Accretion, feedback and galaxy bimodality: a comparison of the GalICS semi-analytic model and cosmological SPH simulations
- The cosmic star formation rate evolution from z=5 to z=0 from the VIMOS VLT Deep Survey
- The angular correlations of galaxies in the COSMOS field
- Evaluating and Improving Semi-analytic modelling of Dust in Galaxies based on Radiative Transfer Calculations
- VVDS-SWIRE: Clustering evolution from a spectroscopic sample of galaxies with redshift 0.2<z<2.1 selected from Spitzer IRAC 3.6 micron and 4.5 micron photometry
- The VVDS-VLA Deep Field - IV: Radio-optical properties
Cited by in corpus (16)
- The VIMOS VLT Deep Survey final data release: a spectroscopic sample of 35016 galaxies and AGN out to z~6.7 selected with 17.5<=i_{AB}<=24.7
- The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS). Galaxy clustering and redshift-space distortions at z=0.8 in the first data release
- Confronting theoretical models with the observed evolution of the galaxy population out to z=4
- The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS). Luminosity and stellar mass dependence of galaxy clustering at 0.5<z<1.1
- Numerical resolution limits on subhalo abundance matching
- The Millennium Run Observatory: First Light
- Machine Learning and Cosmological Simulations I: Semi-Analytical Models
- The evolution of clustering length, large-scale bias and host halo mass at 2<z<5 in the VIMOS Ultra Deep Survey (VUDS)
- On stellar mass loss from galaxies in groups and clusters
- The evolution of the AGN content in groups up to z~1
- The complex case of MACSJ0717.5+3745 and its extended filament: intra-cluster light, galaxy luminosity function, and galaxy orientations
- The VIMOS Public Extragalactic Redshift Survey (VIPERS). Hierarchical scaling and biasing
- Autocorrelations of stellar light and mass at z~0 and ~1: From SDSS to DEEP2
- Comparison of the VIMOS-VLT Deep Survey with the Munich semi-analytical model. II. The colour-density relation up to z=1.5
- What Regulates Galaxy Evolution? Open Questions in Our Understanding of Galaxy Formation and Evolution
- Galaxy-galaxy(-galaxy) lensing as a sensitive probe of galaxy evolution