On the temperature dependence of 2D "metallic" conductivity in Si inversion layers at intermediate temperatures
arXiv:cond-mat/0310260 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.269703
Abstract
We show that the recent experimental claim [Pudalov {\it et al}. \prl {\bf 91}, 126403 (2003) ] of observing ``interaction effects in the conductivity of Si inversion layers at intermediate temperatures'' is incorrect and misleading. In particular, the temperature dependent conductivity , in contrast to the resistivity (which is what is shown in the paper), does not have a linear temperature regime, rendering the extraction of the slope completely arbitrary. We also show that, at least for higher densities, the standard semiclassical transport theory, which includes realistic disorder effects such as scattering by {\it screened} charged impurity and surface roughness, gives essentially quantitative agreement with the experimental data.
arXiv commentComment on Pudalov {\it et al}. Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 91}, 126403 (2003)
References in corpus (5)
- Interaction corrections at intermediate temperatures: I. Longitudinal conductivity and kinetic equation
- The low-density spin susceptibility and effective mass of mobile electrons in Si inversion layers
- Charged impurity scattering limited low temperature resistivity of low density silicon inversion layers
- Interaction Effects in Conductivity of Si Inversion Layers at Intermediate Temperatures
- Metallicity and its low temperature behavior in dilute 2D carrier systems
Cited by in corpus (4)
- Metal-insulator transitions and the effects of electron-electron interactions in two-dimensional electron systems
- The so-called two dimensional metal-insulator transition
- Conductivity of a spin-polarized two-dimensional electron liquid in the ballistic regime
- Temperature dependent weak field Hall resistance in 2D carrier systems