On the temperature dependence of 2D "metallic" conductivity in Si inversion layers at intermediate temperatures
arXiv:cond-mat/0310260 · doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.269703
Abstract
We show that the recent experimental claim [Pudalov {\it et al}. \prl {\bf 91}, 126403 (2003) ] of observing ``interaction effects in the conductivity of Si inversion layers at intermediate temperatures'' is incorrect and misleading. In particular, the temperature dependent conductivity , in contrast to the resistivity (which is what is shown in the paper), does not have a linear temperature regime, rendering the extraction of the slope completely arbitrary. We also show that, at least for higher densities, the standard semiclassical transport theory, which includes realistic disorder effects such as scattering by {\it screened} charged impurity and surface roughness, gives essentially quantitative agreement with the experimental data.
Comment on Pudalov {\it et al}. Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 91}, 126403 (2003)