The ESO-Sculptor Survey: Luminosity functions of galaxies per spectral type at redshifts 0.1-0.5
arXiv:astro-ph/0301339 · doi:10.1051/0004-6361:20030451
Abstract
[ABRIDGED] We present the first statistical analysis of the complete ESO-Sculptor redshift survey (ESS). The flux-calibrated sample of 617 galaxy spectra with R_c<20.5 is separated into 3 spectral classes (early, intermediate, and late). We report in detail on the spectral classification, the polynomial K-corrections, and all sources of corresponding random and systematic errors. The derived luminosity functions (LF) in the Johnson-Cousins B and Rc bands are in agreement with the results from the comparable CNOC2 survey (Lin et al. 1999), whereas the ESS provides the first estimates of LFs per spectral type in the Johnson V band. A renewed interpretation of the galaxy LFs from a redshift survey are obtained by fitting the ESS LFs with composite functions based on the local LFs per morphological type (Sandage, Binggeli & Tammann 1985; Jerjen & Tammann 1997). As good or better fits than with pure Schechter functions are obtained using: for the early-type LF, a two-wing Gaussian; for the intermediate-type LF, the sum of a Gaussian modeling the Spiral galaxies and a steep Schechter function (alpha=-1.5) representing the dwarf elliptical galaxies; for the late-type LF, a similar composite function with a flat or weaker slope (-0.8<alpha<-0.3) for the Schechter component which represents the dwarf Irregular galaxies. This analysis illustrates how LFs per spectral type may be affected by morphological type mixing, and emphasizes the need for a quantitative morphological classification at z>0.1 which separates the giant and dwarf galaxy populations.
arXiv comment33 Pages, 13 color figures, A&A Latex macro. Published in A&A
References in corpus (59)
- Hierarchical Galaxy Formation
- The VizieR database of Astronomical Catalogues
- The Luminosity Function of Galaxies in SDSS Commissioning Data
- The CANADA-FRANCE REDSHIFT SURVEY VI: Evolution of the galaxy luminosity function to z ~ 1
- The COMBO-17 Survey: Evolution of the Galaxy Luminosity Function from 25,000 Galaxies with 0.2<z<1.2
- Evolution of the Hubble Sequence in Hierarchical Models for Galaxy Formation
- Structural and Photometric Classification of Galaxies - I. Calibration Based on a Nearby Galaxy Sample
- K and evolutionary corrections from UV to IR
- The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Galaxy luminosity functions per spectral type
- Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies
- The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: Spectral Types and Luminosity Functions
- Galaxy Formation and Large-Scale Bias
- The Luminosity Function of Galaxies in the Las Campanas Redshift Survey
- The CNOC2 Field Galaxy Luminosity Function I: A Description of Luminosity Function Evolution
- The Galaxy Luminosity Function at z < 0.05: Dependence on Morphology
- Luminosity Function of Morphologically Classified Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
- The Number Density of Low Surface Brightness Galaxies with 23<mu_0<25 V-mag/sqr-arcsecond
- The number, luminosity, and mass density of spiral galaxies as a function of surface brightness
- The UZC-SSRS2 Group Catalog
- Quantitative Morphology of Galaxies in the Hubble Deep Field
- Spectral Classification and Luminosity Function of Galaxies in the Las Campanas Redshift Survey
- Colors and color gradients in bulges of galaxies
- The 2dF Galaxy Redshift Survey: The Number and Luminosity Density of Galaxies
- An Artificial Neural Network Approach to Classification of Galaxy Spectra
- Galaxy Selection and the Surface Brightness Distribution
- The luminosity function of the Virgo Cluster from M_B=-22 to M_B=-11
- Simulating the Formation of the Local Galaxy Population
- Galaxies, Human Eyes and Artificial Neural Networks
- Galaxy Populations and Evolution in Clusters II: Defining Cluster Populations
- Dwarf galaxy formation induced by galaxy interactions
- Estimating Galaxy Luminosity Functions
- Autofib Redshift Survey: II -- The Evolution of the Galaxy Luminosity Function by Spectral Type
- Voids in the Simulated Local Universe
- Tests of Statistical Methods for Estimating Galaxy Luminosity Function and Applications to the Hubble Deep Field
- The Nearby Optical Galaxy Sample: The Local Galaxy Luminosity Function
- The Bivariate Brightness Function of Galaxies and a Demonstration of the Impact of Surface Brightness Selection Effects on Luminosity Function Estimations
- Explorations in Hubble Space: A Quantitative Tuning Fork
- Automated Galaxy Morphology: A Fourier Approach
- Spectroscopy of Dwarf Elliptical Galaxies in the Fornax Cluster
- The Luminosity Distribution of Local Group Galaxies
- The Ursa Major Cluster of Galaxies. III. Optical observations of dwarf galaxies and the luminosity function down to M_R=-11
- Dissecting the luminosity function of the Coma cluster of galaxies using CFHT wide field images
- V and R-band Galaxy Luminosity Functions and Low Surface Brightness Galaxies in the Century Survey
- Spectral Analysis of the Stromlo-APM Survey II. Galaxy luminosity function and clustering by spectral type
- The Intrinsic Shapes of Low-Surface-Brightness Dwarf Irregular Galaxies and Comparison to Other Types of Dwarf Galaxies
- The Durham/UKST Galaxy Redshift Survey - II. The Field Galaxy Luminosity Function
- Properties of Low Surface Brightness Galaxies and Normal Spirals in the Near-IR
- The Luminosity Function of Field Galaxies in the CNOC1 Redshift Survey
- Quantitative Morphology of Galaxies Observed in the Ultraviolet
- Systematic Biases in Galaxy Luminosity Functions
- The Luminosity Function Of Field Galaxies And Its Evolution Since z=1
- On the Luminosity Function of Early--Type Galaxies
- The Norris Survey of the Corona Borealis Supercluster: II. Galaxy Evolution with Redshift and Environment
- Caltech Faint Galaxy Redshift Survey XV: Classification of Galaxies with 0.2 < z < 1.1 in the Hubble Deep Field (North) and its Flanking Fields
- The ESO-Sculptor Faint Galaxy Redshift Survey: The Photometric Sample
- Classification and redshift estimation by principal component analysis
- A study of the core of the Shapley Concentration: VI. Spectral properties of galaxies
- The z=0 Galaxy Luminosity Function: I. Techniques for Identification of Dwarf Galaxies at ~10 Mpc
- Dwarf Galaxies in the Leo I Group: the Group Luminosity Function beyond the Local Group
Cited by in corpus (38)
- Galaxy Luminosity Functions to z~1: DEEP2 vs. COMBO-17 and Implications for Red Galaxy Formation
- The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: The Galaxy Luminosity Function to z ~ 1
- The VIMOS-VLT Deep Survey: Evolution of the galaxy luminosity function up to z=2 in first epoch data
- The EFIGI catalogue of 4458 nearby galaxies with detailed morphology
- The evolution of the luminosity functions in the FORS Deep Field from low to high redshift: I. The blue bands
- The VIMOS VLT Deep Survey - Evolution of the luminosity functions by galaxy type up to z=1.5 from first epoch data
- Galaxy morphology, luminosity and, environment in the SDSS DR7
- The zCOSMOS survey: the role of the environment in the evolution of the luminosity function of different galaxy types
- Shedding Light on the Galaxy Luminosity Function
- Galaxy luminosity function per morphological type up to z=1.2
- The VVDS-SWIRE-GALEX-CFHTLS surveys: Physical properties of galaxies at z below 1.2 from photometric data
- The evolution of the luminosity functions in the FORS Deep Field from low to high redshift: II. The red bands
- The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: Spectral classification of galaxies at z~1
- Bias in the Estimation of Global Luminosity Functions
- Bivariate Galaxy Luminosity Functions in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
- Shapley Optical Survey. I: Luminosity Functions in the Supercluster Environment
- The MicroJy and NanoJy Radio Sky: Source Population and Multi-wavelength Properties
- The Galaxy Optical Luminosity Function from the AGN and Galaxy Evolution Survey (AGES)
- Critical analysis of the luminosity functions per galaxy type measured from redshift surveys
- Constructing a bivariate distribution function with given marginals and correlation: application to the galaxy luminosity function
- The Oxford-Dartmouth Thirty Degree Survey II: Clustering of Bright Lyman Break Galaxies - Strong Luminosity Dependent Bias at z=4
- Evolutionary paths among different red galaxy types at 0.3 < z < 1.5 and the late buildup of massive E-S0's through major mergers
- The EFIGI catalogue of 4458 nearby galaxies with morphology II. Statistical properties along the Hubble sequence
- Compact Groups in the UZC galaxy sample: II. Connections between morphology, luminosity and large-scale density
- Optical Luminosity Functions of the Abell Galaxy Cluster ABCG 209 at z=0.21
- Estimating cosmological parameters from future gravitational lens surveys
- The faint-end of the galaxy luminosity function in groups
- Inferring the photometric and size evolution of galaxies from image simulations
- The Faint End Slopes Of Galaxy Luminosity Functions In The COSMOS 2-Square Degree Field
- Principal component analysis of the Spitzer IRS spectra of ultraluminous infrared galaxies
- Galaxy Evolution in the Environment of ABCG 209
- The 12um ISO-ESO-Sculptor and 24um Spitzer faint counts reveal a population of ULIRG/AGN/dusty massive ellipticals Evolution by types and cosmic star formation
- Constructing a multivariate distribution function with a vine copula: toward multivariate luminosity and mass functions
- Probability for chance coincidence of a gamma-ray burst with a galaxy on the sky
- The galaxy luminosity function around groups
- The ESO-Sculptor Survey: Evolution of late-type galaxies at redshifts 0.1-0.5
- Spatial clustering in the ESO-Sculptor Survey: two-point correlation functions by galaxy type at redshifts 0.1 - 0.5
- The mag dip in the galaxy luminosity function of Hickson Compact Groups