On the Luminosity Function of Early--Type Galaxies

Abstract

In a recent paper Loveday et al. (1992) have presented new results on the luminosity function for a sample of galaxies with $b_J\le 17.15$. After having morphologically classified each galaxy (early--type, late--type, merged or uncertain), they have estimated the parameters of a Schechter luminosity function for early-- and late--type galaxies. However, in their sample there is a bias against identifying early--type galaxies at large distances and/or faint magnitudes: in fact, many of the early--type galaxies at faint magnitudes have probably been classified as ``uncertain". As discussed in Loveday et al., the existence of such a bias is indicated by the fact that for these galaxies $<V/V_{max}>=0.32$. In this paper we show, both theoretically and through the use of simulated samples, that this incompleteness strongly biases the derived parameters of the luminosity function for early--type galaxies. If no correction for such incompleteness is applied to the data (as done by Loveday et al.), one obtains a flatter slope $\alpha$ and a brighter $M^{\ast }$ with respect to the real parameters.

accepted for publication on MNRAS, Standard TeX, for tables and figures contact [email protected] BAP 03-1994-04-IRA

Cited by in corpus (26)

• The DEEP2 Galaxy Redshift Survey: The Galaxy Luminosity Function to z ~ 1
• The infrared luminosity function of galaxies at redshifts z=1 and z~2 in the GOODS fields
• The VIMOS-VLT Deep Survey: Evolution of the galaxy luminosity function up to z=2 in first epoch data
• The Galaxy Luminosity Function at z < 0.05: Dependence on Morphology
• Luminosity Function of Morphologically Classified Galaxies in the Sloan Digital Sky Survey
• Tracking the impact of environment on the Galaxy Stellar Mass Function up to z~1 in the 10k zCOSMOS sample
• The K20 survey. V The evolution of the near-IR Luminosity Function
• The Hubble Deep Fields
• The Hawaii-AAO K-band Galaxy Redshift Survey -- Paper I: The Local K-band Luminosity Function
• The Velocity Function of Galaxies
• Spectral Analysis of the Stromlo-APM Survey I. Spectral Properties of Galaxies
• The zCOSMOS survey: the role of the environment in the evolution of the luminosity function of different galaxy types
• Low Surface Brightness Galaxies in the Local Universe. III. Implications for the Field Galaxy Luminosity Function
• The Nearby Optical Galaxy Sample: The Local Galaxy Luminosity Function
• The ESO-Sculptor Survey: Luminosity functions of galaxies per spectral type at redshifts 0.1-0.5
• Spectral Analysis of the Stromlo-APM Survey II. Galaxy luminosity function and clustering by spectral type
• The Luminosity Function of Field Galaxies in the CNOC1 Redshift Survey
• Luminosity Functions of Elliptical Galaxies at z < 1.2
• The Norris Survey of the Corona Borealis Supercluster: II. Galaxy Evolution with Redshift and Environment
• The X-ray luminosity function of AGN at z~3
• Evolution of the far-infrared luminosity functions in the Spitzer Wide-area Infrared Extragalactic Legacy Survey
• The galaxy luminosity function and the Local Hole
• Exploring the Luminosity Evolution and Stellar Mass Assembly of 2SLAQ Luminous Red Galaxies Between Redshift 0.4 and 0.8
• The ESO-Sculptor Survey: Evolution of late-type galaxies at redshifts 0.1-0.5
• The miniJPAS survey. Evolution of the luminosity and stellar mass functions of galaxies up to $z\sim 0.7$
• An Elliptical Galaxy Luminosity Function and Velocity Dispersion Sample of Relevance for Gravitational Lensing Statistics