On DESI's DR2 exclusion of CDM
arXiv:2504.15336 · doi:10.1093/mnrasl/slaf108
Abstract
The DESI collaboration, combining their Baryon Acoustic Oscillation (BAO) data with cosmic microwave background (CMB) anisotropy and supernovae data, have found significant indication against the CDM cosmology. This can also be interpreted as the significance of the detection of the parameter that measures variation of the dark energy equation of state. DESI's DR2 article quotes exclusion of CDM for combinations of BAO and CMB data with each of three different and overlapping supernovae compilations (at 2.8-sigma for Pantheon+, 3.8-sigma for Union3, and 4.2-sigma for DESY5). We show that one can neither choose amongst nor average over these three different significances. We demonstrate how a principled statistical combination yields a combined exclusion significance of 3.1-sigma. Further we argue that, faced with these competing significances, the most secure inference from the DESI DR2 results is the 3.1-sigma level exclusion of CDM obtained from combining DESI+CMB alone, omitting supernovae.
arXiv comment6 pages with two figures, updated to match version accepted by MNRAS
References in corpus (28)
- Observational Evidence from Supernovae for an Accelerating Universe and a Cosmological Constant
- Measurements of Omega and Lambda from 42 High-Redshift Supernovae
- A Phantom Menace? Cosmological consequences of a dark energy component with super-negative equation of state
- Exploring the Expansion History of the Universe
- Accelerating Universes with Scaling Dark Matter
- The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints
- DESI 2024 VI: Cosmological Constraints from the Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations
- The Pantheon+ Analysis: The Full Dataset and Light-Curve Release
- SALT2: using distant supernovae to improve the use of Type Ia supernovae as distance indicators
- DESI DR2 Results II: Measurements of Baryon Acoustic Oscillations and Cosmological Constraints
- Probing the dark energy: methods and strategies
- The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters
- Planck intermediate results. LVII. Joint Planck LFI and HFI data processing
- DESI 2024: Reconstructing Dark Energy using Crossing Statistics with DESI DR1 BAO data
- SALT3: An Improved Type Ia Supernova Model for Measuring Cosmic Distances
- Interpreting DESI's evidence for evolving dark energy
- Combining cosmological datasets: hyperparameters and Bayesian evidence
- Interpreting DESI 2024 BAO: late-time dynamical dark energy or a local effect?
- Underdetermination of dark energy
- UNITY: Confronting Supernova Cosmology's Statistical and Systematic Uncertainties in a Unified Bayesian Framework
- Dynamical Dark Energy in light of the DESI DR2 Baryonic Acoustic Oscillations Measurements
- The DESI DR1/DR2 evidence for dynamical dark energy is biased by low-redshift supernovae
- SALT2 Versus SALT3: Updated Model Surfaces and Their Impacts on Type Ia Supernova Cosmology
- Power Spectra to 1% Accuracy between Dynamical Dark Energy Cosmologies
- Bayesian Model Averaging in Astrophysics: A Review
- Improved null tests of CDM and FLRW in light of DESI DR2
- On dataset tensions and signatures of new cosmological physics
- Talk about Pivots
Cited by in corpus (10)
- Is Dark Energy Dynamical in the DESI Era? A Critical Review
- Cosmological constraints on Galileon dark energy with broken shift symmetry
- Calibration-independent consistency test of DESI DR2 BAO and SNIa
- Probing departures from CDM by late-time datasets
- Evidence for evolving dark energy from DESI DR2 BAO and Pantheon, DES-Dovekie, and Union3
- Model-Independent Dark Energy Measurements from DESI DR2 and Planck 2015 Data
- Comparing measures of the Hubble and BAO tensions in CDM and possible solutions in gravity
- Lowering the Horizon on Dark Energy: A Late-Time Response to Early Solutions for the Hubble Tension
- Breaking Free from the Swampland of Impossible Universes through the DESI Portal
- Diverse reddening distributions in sight lines to type Ia supernovae