Misaligned incentives in sports: A mathematical analysis of the post-2024 UEFA Champions League qualification
arXiv:2406.12636 · doi:10.1093/imaman/dpaf016
Abstract
UEFA declares that it is committed to respecting the fundamental values of sports. However, the qualification rules of the post-2024 UEFA Champions League are shown to be unfair: a game with misaligned incentives was narrowly avoided in the 2023/24 German Bundesliga. We develop a mathematical model to reveal how incentives for losing can be reduced or eliminated. Since UEFA repeatedly commits the same theoretical mistake in designing the qualification system of its competitions, governing bodies in sports are called to work more closely together with the scientific community.
arXiv comment14 pages, 1 figure, 2 tables
References in corpus (9)
- Quantifying incentive (in)compatibility: A case study from sports
- The UEFA Champions League seeding is not strategy-proof since the 2015/16 season
- UEFA Champions League entry has not satisfied strategyproofness in three seasons
- UEFA against the champions? An evaluation of the recent reform of the Champions League qualification
- Tournament design: A review from an operational research perspective
- Tournament schedules and incentives in a double round-robin tournament with four teams
- The incentive (in)compatibility of group-based qualification systems
- When neither team wants to win: a flaw of recent UEFA qualification rules
- On head-to-head results as tie-breaker and consequent opportunities for collusion