Tournament schedules and incentives in a double round-robin tournament with four teams
arXiv:2204.08276 · doi:10.1111/itor.13391
Abstract
In a round-robin tournament, a team may lack the incentive to win if its final rank does not depend on the outcome of the matches still to be played. This paper introduces a classification scheme to determine these weakly (where one team is indifferent) or strongly (where both teams are indifferent) stakeless matches in a double round-robin contest with four teams. The probability that such matches arise can serve as a novel fairness criterion to compare and evaluate match schedules. Our approach is illustrated by the UEFA Champions League group stage. A simulation model is built to compare the 12 valid schedules for the group matches. Some schedules are shown to be dominated by other schedules. It is found that the strongest team should play at home in the last round against one of the middle teams, depending on the preferences of the tournament organiser. Choosing an optimal sequence of matches with respect to the proposed metric can help to avoid uninteresting matches.
arXiv comment30 pages, 2 figures, 10 tables
References in corpus (4)
- Quantifying incentive (in)compatibility: A case study from sports
- The UEFA Champions League seeding is not strategy-proof since the 2015/16 season
- A simulation comparison of tournament designs for the World Men's Handball Championships
- UEFA against the champions? An evaluation of the recent reform of the Champions League qualification
Cited by in corpus (5)
- Tournament design: A review from an operational research perspective
- Mitigating the risk of tanking in multi-stage tournaments
- Competitive balance in the UEFA Champions League group stage: Novel measures show no evidence of decline
- Misaligned incentives in sports: A mathematical analysis of the post-2024 UEFA Champions League qualification
- Evaluating Competitiveness in UEFA's New Champions League Format