Sound Horizon Independent Constraints on Early Dark Energy: The Role of Supernova Data
arXiv:2403.11916 · doi:10.1088/1475-7516/2024/10/011
Abstract
We assess the consistency of cosmological models that alter the size of the sound horizon at last scattering to resolve the Hubble tension with data from ACT + Planck CMB lensing, Big Bang Nucleosynthesis, and supernova data from Pantheon or Pantheon+. We use early dark energy (EDE) as an example model but conclude that the results apply to other similar models. We constrain CDM and EDE with these data finding that while they can constrain CDM very tightly, EDE opens up the parameter space significantly and allows km s Mpc. We combine these data with measurements from ACT + Planck TT650TEEE CMB primary anisotropy and galaxy baryon acoustic oscillations, and find that overall, EDE fits these data better than CDM at . However, the fit to specifically the sound-horizon-independent measurements is worse for EDE than CDM. We assess this increase in coming from the sound-horizon-independent measurements and find that the best-fit model is still consistent with a random statistical fluctuation even with values around km s Mpc. We conclude that these specific sound-horizon-independent data cannot rule out the possibility of a miscalibration of the size of the sound horizon, but leave open the possibility that other current or future sound-horizon-independent data sets could rule out such a miscalibration.
26 pages, 6 Figures, Published in JCAP
References in corpus (29)
- A Comprehensive Measurement of the Local Value of the Hubble Constant with 1 km/s/Mpc Uncertainty from the Hubble Space Telescope and the SH0ES Team
- In the Realm of the Hubble tension a Review of Solutions
- The Clustering of the SDSS DR7 Main Galaxy Sample I: A 4 per cent Distance Measure at z=0.15
- The Pantheon+ Analysis: Cosmological Constraints
- Cobaya: Code for Bayesian Analysis of hierarchical physical models
- The Hubble Hunter's Guide
- The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR4 Maps and Cosmological Parameters
- The Olympics: A fair ranking of proposed models
- Seven hints that early-time new physics alone is not sufficient to solve the Hubble tension
- The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: DR6 Gravitational Lensing Map and Cosmological Parameters
- Early Dark Energy Does Not Restore Cosmological Concordance
- Measurements of the E-Mode Polarization and Temperature-E-Mode Correlation of the CMB from SPT-3G 2018 Data
- Constraining Early Dark Energy with Large-Scale Structure
- New Early Dark Energy
- The Hubble Tension in Light of the Full-Shape Analysis of Large-Scale Structure Data
- The Atacama Cosmology Telescope: Constraints on Pre-Recombination Early Dark Energy
- New constraint on Early Dark Energy from Planck and BOSS data using the profile likelihood
- Dark Energy at early times and ACT: a larger Hubble constant without late-time priors
- Hints of Early Dark Energy in Planck, SPT, and ACT data: new physics or systematics?
- Comparing early dark energy and extra radiation solutions to the Hubble tension with BBN
- Recombination-independent determination of the sound horizon and the Hubble constant from BAO
- Towards early dark energy and =1 with Planck, ACT and SPT
- The Early Dark Sector, the Hubble Tension, and the Swampland
- Determining the Hubble Constant without the Sound Horizon Scale: Measurements from CMB Lensing
- Determining the Hubble Constant without the Sound Horizon: A Constraint on from Galaxy Surveys, CMB Lensing and Supernovae
- The Dark Energy Survey: Cosmology Results With ~1500 New High-redshift Type Ia Supernovae Using The Full 5-year Dataset
- A Dark Matter Trigger for Early Dark Energy Coincidence
- Early dark energy constraints with late-time expansion marginalization
- Procoli: Profiles of cosmological likelihoods