Oppressed species can form a winning pair in a multi-species ecosystem

Abstract

The self-protection of alliances against external invaders is a key concept behind the maintenance of biodiversity in the face of natural selection. But since these alliances, which can be formed by different numbers of competitors, can also compete against each other, it is important to identify their strengths and weaknesses. Here, we therefore compare the vitalities of two two-species alliances whose members either beat each other mutually via a bidirectional invasion or they exchange their positions during an inner dynamics. The resulting four-species model shows rich behavior in dependence on the model parameter $p$, which characterizes the inner invasions, and $\beta$, which determines the intensity of site exchanges. In the low $p$ and the large $p$ limit, when the inner invasion becomes biased, three-member rock-scissors-paper-type solutions emerge, where one of the members is oppressed by having the smallest average concentration due to heterogeneous inner invasion rates. Interestingly, however, if we allow a more intensive site exchange between the oppressed species, they can morph into a winning pair and dominate the full parameter plane. We show that their victory utilizes the vulnerability of the rival alliance based on cyclic dominance, where a species can easily fixate a limited-size domain.

arXiv comment10 pages, 8 figures

References in corpus (36)

• Mobility promotes and jeopardizes biodiversity in rock-paper-scissors games
• Cyclic dominance in evolutionary games: A review
• Alliance formation with exclusion in the spatial public goods game
• Stochastic population dynamics in spatially extended predator-prey systems
• Cyclical interactions with alliance-specific heterogeneous invasion rates
• Zero-one survival behavior of cyclically competing species
• Spatial Rock-Paper-Scissors Models with Inhomogeneous Reaction Rates
• Dynamically generated cyclic dominance in spatial prisoner's dilemma games
• Phase transition and selection in a four-species cyclic Lotka-Volterra model
• Diverging fluctuations in a spatial five-species cyclic dominance game
• Defensive alliances in spatial models of cyclical population interactions
• Pattern formations driven by cyclic interactions: a brief review of recent developments
• Reentrant phase transitions and defensive alliances in social dilemmas with informed strategies
• A three-state cyclic voter model extended with Potts energy
• Phase transitions induced by variation of invasion rates in spatial cyclic predator-prey models with four or six species
• Predominance of the weakest species in Lotka-Volterra and May-Leonard implementations of the rock-paper-scissors model
• Costly hide and seek pays: Unexpected consequences of deceit in a social dilemma
• Interfaces with internal structures in generalized rock-paper-scissors models
• How directional mobility affects biodiversity in rock-paper-scissors models
• Strategy dependent learning activity in cyclic dominant systems
• A theoretical approach to understand spatial organization in complex ecologies
• Vortex dynamics in a three-state model under cyclic dominance
• The Influence of Mobility Rate on Spiral Waves in Spatial Rock-Paper-Scissors Games
• The effect of habitats and fitness on species coexistence in systems with cyclic dominance
• Perturbing cyclic predator-prey systems: how a six-species coarsening system with non-trivial in-domain dynamics responds to sudden changes
• Instability of defensive alliances in the predator-prey model on complex networks
• Dynamically generated hierarchies in games of competition
• Invasion controlled pattern formation in a generalized multi-species predator-prey system
• Coevolutionary dynamics of a variant of the cyclic Lotka-Volterra model with three-agent interactions
• Risk and interaction aversion: screening mechanisms in the Prisoner's Dilemma game
• Performance of weak species in the simplest generalization of the rock-paper-scissors model to four species
• Weak species in rock-paper-scissors models
• Breaking unidirectional invasions jeopardizes biodiversity in spatial May-Leonard systems
• Mobility driven coexistence of living organisms
• Equal partners do better in defensive alliances
• Competition among alliances of different sizes

Cited by in corpus (2)

• When faster rotation is harmful: the competition of alliances with inner blocking mechanism
• Locally adaptive aggregation of organisms under death risk in rock-paper-scissors models