Importance of Mock Observations in Validating Galaxy Properties for Cosmological Simulations
arXiv:2109.08838 · doi:10.1093/mnras/stab2722
Abstract
The galaxy luminosity function and galaxy stellar mass function are fundamental statistics in the testing of galaxy formation models. Theoretical predictions based on cosmological simulations can deviate from observations, especially at the bright and faint ends. In this case, the mismatch may come from missing physics, oversimplified or inaccurate model recipes, or inappropriate methods of extracting basic astrophysical quantities from simulations. The latter is a crucial aspect to consider to avoid misleading conclusions when comparing simulations with observations. In this paper, we have applied a new method to produce `observed' galaxies identified in mock imaging of hydrodynamical simulations. We generate low-redshift mock galaxies from the TNG100-1 simulation of IllustrisTNG and analyse them using standard `observational' techniques to extract their main structural parameters. We show that our technique can produce realistic surface-brightness distributions of the simulated galaxies, including classical morphological substructures, such as spiral arms and bars. In particular, we find a very good agreement of the total luminosity and stellar mass versus halo mass relationships, and the galaxy stellar mass versus size relationship between mock observations and real galaxies. We also compare the luminosity function and the mass function of the mock galaxy sample with literature data and find a good agreement at all luminosity and mass scales. In particular, we find no significant tension at the bright end of the galaxy luminosity function, as reported in many analyses using simplified recipes to identify galaxy haloes, which in fact miscount the contribution of the extended galaxy haloes around large galaxies. This demonstrates the critical impact of using observational driven approaches to the simulation analyses to produce realistic predictions to compare to observations.
Replacement of arxiv:2109.08838 for matching the publication
References in corpus (22)
- The EAGLE project: Simulating the evolution and assembly of galaxies and their environments
- Introducing the Illustris Project: Simulating the coevolution of dark and visible matter in the Universe
- K-corrections and filter transformations in the ultraviolet, optical, and near infrared
- UV Star Formation Rates in the Local Universe
- Properties of galaxies reproduced by a hydrodynamic simulation
- Simulating galaxy formation with black hole driven thermal and kinetic feedback
- Introducing the Illustris Project: the evolution of galaxy populations across cosmic time
- Constraining the Low-Mass Slope of the Star Formation Sequence at 0.5<z<2.5
- The Importance of Satellite Quenching for the Build-Up of the Red Sequence of Present Day Galaxies
- The Size Evolution of Star-forming and Quenched Galaxies in the IllustrisTNG simulation
- On the galaxy stellar mass function, the mass-metallicity relation, and the implied baryonic mass function
- Galaxy And Mass Assembly: Deconstructing Bimodality - I. Red ones and blue ones
- Intracluster Light at the Frontier II: The Frontier Fields Clusters
- Lost but not Forgotten: Intracluster Light in Galaxy Groups and Clusters
- Galaxies in the Illustris simulation as seen by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey - II: Size-luminosity relations and the deficit of bulge-dominated galaxies in Illustris at low mass
- Dark Sky Simulations: Early Data Release
- Spatially resolved kinematics in the central 1 kpc of a compact star-forming galaxy at z=2.3 from ALMA CO observations
- A missing outskirts problem? Comparisons between stellar halos in the Dragonfly Nearby Galaxies Survey and the TNG100 simulation
- Galaxies in the Illustris simulation as seen by the Sloan Digital Sky Survey - I: Bulge+disc decompositions, methods, and biases
- A New View of the Size-Mass Distribution of Galaxies: Using and instead of
- On the Mass Distribution of the Intra-Cluster Light in Galaxy Groups and Clusters
- Empirical optical k-Corrections for redshifts <= 0.7