A quintet of quandaries: five no-go theorems for Relational Quantum Mechanics
arXiv:2107.00670 · doi:10.1007/s10701-021-00500-6
Abstract
Relational quantum mechanics (RQM) proposes an ontology of relations between physical systems, where any system can serve as an `observer' and any physical interaction between systems counts as a `measurement'. Quantities take unique values spontaneously in these interactions, and the occurrence of such `quantum events' is strictly relative to the observing system, making them `relative facts'. The quantum state represents the objective information that one system has about another by virtue of correlations between their physical variables. The ontology of RQM thereby strives to uphold the universality and completeness of quantum theory, while at the same time maintaining that the actualization of each unique quantum event is a fundamental physical event. Can RQM sustain this precarious balancing act? Here we present five no-go theorems that imply it cannot; something has to give way.
16 pages. Updated references, fixed typos. Companion to arXiv:2108.13977
References in corpus (5)
Cited by in corpus (8)
- Relational Quantum Mechanics is about Facts, not States: A reply to Pienaar and Brukner
- QBism and Relational Quantum Mechanics compared
- Relative Facts of Relational Quantum Mechanics are Incompatible with Quantum Mechanics
- Fact-nets: towards a mathematical framework for relational quantum mechanics
- Algebraic properties of quantum reference frames: Does time fluctuate?
- An attempt to understand relational quantum mechanics
- The Relational Dissolution of the Quantum Measurement Problems
- A critical analysis of `Relative facts do not exist. Relational quantum mechanics is incompatible with quantum mechanics' by Jay Lawrence, Marcin Markiewicz and Marek Źukowski