An argument against the realistic interpretation of the wave function

Abstract

Testable predictions of quantum mechanics are invariant under time reversal. But the change of the quantum state in time is not so, neither in the collapse nor in the no-collapse interpretations of the theory. This fact challenges the realistic interpretation of the quantum state. On the other hand, this fact follows easily if we interpret the quantum state as a mere calculation device, bookkeeping past real quantum events. The same conclusion follows from the analysis of the meaning of the wave function in the semiclassical regime.

4 pages, 3 figures

References in corpus (1)

• Rovelli' s relational quantum mechanics, monism and quantum becoming

Cited by in corpus (16)

• A quintet of quandaries: five no-go theorems for Relational Quantum Mechanics
• "Space is blue and birds fly through it"
• Neither Presentism nor Eternalism
• The arrow of time in operational formulations of quantum theory
• Quantum causality and the arrows of time and thermodynamics
• The Bundle Theory Approach to Relational Quantum Mechanics
• Reversing the Arrow of Time
• Markovian and non-Markovian quantum measurements
• Relational Quantum Mechanics and the PBR Theorem: A Peaceful Coexistence
• Appearance of Thermal Time
• Are quantum spins but small perturbations of ontological Ising spins?
• The Relational Interpretation of Quantum Physics
• Cellular automaton ontology, bits, qubits, and the Dirac equation
• Are Quantum-Classical Hybrids compatible with Ontological Cellular Automata?
• Fact-nets: towards a mathematical framework for relational quantum mechanics
• The Relational Dissolution of the Quantum Measurement Problems